Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Whose Equality? Freedom of Religious Associations and Gaum v. Van Rensburg

Bibliographic Data

ID20511749
AuthorsStéphane De Freitas (0000-0003-0236-0109, University of the Free State, corresponding author), Shaun De Freitas
Year2023
Volume38
Issue2
Pages249-264
Publication date2023-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Law and Religion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0748-0814 • E-ISSN: 2163-3088
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/jlr.2023.6
OpenAlexW4379347755
LanguageEN
References cited10

In Gaum and Others v. Van Rensburg NO and Others , the South African High Court held the view that a decision taken by the Synod of the Dutch Reformed Church, which included a condition of a life of celibacy for gays and lesbians in order to be ordained as ministers in the church, along with a prohibition against the solemnizing of same-sex civil unions by ministers in the church, resulted in a violation of the right to equality and that unfair discrimination based on sexual orientation had taken place. Consequently, the finding in Gaum postulated a specific view on the permissible boundaries regarding conduct related to sexual orientation that should apply to a religious association. In this regard, Gaum is of concern when considering that courts in democracies around the world generally refrain from getting involved in matters related to the central doctrines of a religious association. Gaum ’s findings are disquieting not only for the effective protection of the right to freedom of religion (in both an individual and associational context) but also for the furtherance of diversity. It is argued in this article that Gaum exceeded its jurisdiction in adjudicating on matters related to conduct regarding sexual orientation, an argument that critically focuses on the concept of equality against the background of the importance of the protection of the autonomy of religious associations

Autonomy · Celibacy · Freedom of association · Freedom of Religion · Human rights · Jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Religious freedom · Sexual orientation · Sociology · Discrimination and Equality Law · Gender Studies · History · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa · Religious Freedom and Discrimination

  • The Myth of Liberalism

    John P Safranek, John Safranek•The Myth of Liberalism•2015

  • Liberal Pluralism

    Open Access•William A Galston•Liberal Pluralism•2002

  • The Empty Idea of Equality

    Peter Westen•Harvard Law Review•1982

  • The Disenchantment of Secular Discourse

    Steven D Smith, Steven D Smith-undifferentiated•Disenchantment of Secular Discourse•2010

  • The Right of Religious Associations to Discriminate

    Patrick Lenta•South African Journal on Human…•2012

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae