Empédocle FVS 31 B 115, 11 D.-K
Ἠελίου φαέθοντος ou ἠελίου ἀνκάμαντος
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17412866 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marcel Meulder (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 94 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 47-66 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revue belge de philologie et d histoire (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0035-0818 • E-ISSN: 2295-9068 |
| Publisher | Society for the Advancement of Philological and Historical Studies (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3406/rbph.2016.8874 |
| OpenAlex | W2746278450 |
| Language | FR |
The analysis of the use and the semantic field of the terms φαέθων and ἀκάμας / ἀκἀματος in Greek archaic and classical literature prove that we must read in Empedocles FVS 31 B 115, 11 DK not ἠελίου φαέθοντος Hippolytus of Rome wrote (because he was likely influenced by the stoic theory of universal cataclysm), but ἠελίου ἀκάμαντος (so Plutarchus). This nominal group is linked to the Homeric and Hesiodic concept of tireless, quick and destructive fire, its concept fits into the reign of the Strife Empedocles described, and its words fit into the sonority of the fragment 115
Algorithm · Art · Field (mathematics) · Fragment (logic) · Group (periodic table) · Humanities · Linguistics · Literature · Physics · Political science · Pure mathematics · Reign · Sonority hierarchy · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Computer Science · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |