How different forms of social rank are expressed in social behavior
A study of emerging adults in cooperative and competitive contexts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17560260 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nina S Chmielowice‐Szymanski (0009-0005-6311-8924, Radboud University, The Netherlands), Nina S Chmielowice-Szymanski (Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author), Joey T Cheng (0000-0002-7041-2196, York University), Mallory A Millett (0000-0002-7547-5129, Radboud University, The Netherlands), Antonius H N Cillessen (0000-0002-5884-907X, Radboud University, The Netherlands), Tessa A M Lansu (0000-0003-2419-0315, Radboud University, The Netherlands) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Behavioral Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0165-0254 • E-ISSN: 1464-0651 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/01650254251414345 |
| OpenAlex | W7128017154 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 53 |
This study aims to provide insight into the overlap and distinctiveness of four forms of social rank (i.e., popularity, likeability, dominance, and prestige) that are frequently discussed across the social sciences. We do so by examining the associations of these self-reported social rank indicators with each other, and with observer-rated social behaviors (positive behavior, skillful leadership, negative behavior, dominant behavior, and behavioral influence) in emerging adults ( n = 232, age: 18–25, 54% women) interacting in online cooperative and competitive group tasks. Results showed that the four social rank indicators were distinct, as evidenced by moderate correlations and unique profiles of behavioral correlates. After controlling for other social rank indicators, prestige emerged as the most robust and consistent predictor of observer-rated social behavior, including positive behavior, skillful leadership, and behavioral influence, across both contexts. Taken together, our results reveal that popularity, likeability, and prestige overlap most strongly and partially share behavioral profiles, whereas these three social rank indicators are distinct from dominance
Optimal distinctiveness theory · Prestige · Social comparison theory · Social group · Social perception · Social relation · Social status · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Personality Traits and Psychology · Social Power and Status Dynamics
On the dynamics of social hierarchy
Dominance and prestige as differential predictors of aggression and testosterone levels in men
Sex Differences in Social Behavior
Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status
Cocor
Understanding Popularity in the Peer System
Dominance and Prestige
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Social Influence
Understanding the Leaders of Tomorrow
Investigating evolutionary models of leadership among recently settled Ethiopian hunter-gatherers
Two Ways to Stay at the Top
Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status
The evolution of prestige
The Ontogenesis of Social Dominance
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being
Structuring hierarchy concepts
Popularity According to Emerging Adults
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
The (non) gradual association of popularity with peer‐nominated and observed behavior in a cooperative and competitive context
Children's Social Constructions of Popularity
Peer Status in Emerging Adulthood
Identifying Subtypes of Peer Status by Combining Popularity and Preference
Aggression and social status
Achieving social influence across gender and time
Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart Power
Popularity, likeability, and peer conformity
Two ways to the top
Two signals of social rank
To lead or to be liked
Peer relations and later personal adjustment
The need to belong
Perceived influence of close friends, well-liked peers, and popular peers
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |