Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

‘When you're sitting in the room with two people one of whom… has bashed the hell out of the other’

Possibilities and challenges in the use of FGCs and restorative approaches following domestic violence

Datos Bibliográficos

ID17568616
AutoresRobin Sen (0000-0002-3090-8250, University of Sheffield, autor de correspondencia), Kristal Morris (0000-0002-1245-1023, University of Sheffield), Kate Morris (0000-0003-2452-2957), Gale Burford (University of Vermont), Brid Featherstone (0000-0001-6131-7499, University of Huddersfield), Calum Jr Webb (0000-0001-7521-2110, University of Sheffield)
Año2018
Volumen88
Páginas441-449
Fecha de publicación2018-03-20
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaChildren and Youth Services Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0190-7409 • E-ISSN: 1873-7765
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.027
OpenAlexW2793854468
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas9

Domestic violence continues to be a primary reason for referrals to state child welfare services in advanced industrialised countries. There is growing concern in many state child welfare services to develop responses to it that are both more effective and more humane. The use of restorative approaches, in particular Family Group Conferences (FGCs), has been suggested as one such response. This article draws from data gathered from an evaluation of a UK Government funded “Innovation Project” part of which extended the use of FGCs in an urban local authority area which was already making extensive use of them. This paper presents and explores a typology of FGCs used in situations of domestic violence: pragmatic, resolution-focussed and restorative FGCs, developed from the evaluation data and augmented by relevant literature. The study data revealed pragmatic FGCs to be the most used, restorative the least. It is suggested that each type of FGC brings potential benefits but only restorative FGCs offer the possibility of full restoration in the traditionally understood sense. It is argued that the present mother-centric, risk-adverse, child protection systems which currently operate in many countries provide a powerful resistor to the greater implementation of this restorative way of working

Business · Criminology · Political science · Public relations · Restorative justice · Sociology · Typology · Child Abuse and Trauma · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Medicine · Psychology

  • Framed to fit? Challenging the domestic abuse ‘story’ in child protection

    Greig Ferguson, Brid Featherstone et al.•Critical and Radical Social Work•2019

  • Gendered Discourses of Responsibility and Domestic Abuse Victim-Blame in the English Children’s Social Care System

    Open Access•Jessica Wild•Journal of Family Violence•2022

  • The Child Protection Response to Domestic Violence and Abuse

    Open Access•Hannah Hale, Kelly Bracewell et al.•Journal of Family Violence•2024

  • Exploring the declining rates of state social work intervention in an English local authority using Family Group Conferences

    Open Access•Robin Sen, Calum Jr Webb et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2019

  • Family Group Conference Provision in UK Local Authorities and Associations with Children Looked after Rates

    Open Access•Sophie Wood, Jonathan Scourfield et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2024

  • Crime, Shame and Reintegration

    Open Access•John Braithwaite•Crime, Shame and Reintegration•1989

  • Identifying the key components of a ‘whole family’ intervention for families experiencing domestic violence and abuse

    Nicky Stanley, Cathy Humphreys•Journal of Gender-Based Violence•2017

  • Exploring approaches to child welfare in contexts of domestic violence and abuse

    Open Access•Mary Moussa Rogers, Kate Parkinson•Child & Family Social Work•2017

  • The Three Planet Model

    Marianne Hester•The British Journal of Social Work•2011

  • Re-Imagining Child Protection

    S Rogowski•The British Journal of Social Work•2014

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Austerity, rationing and inequity

    Calum Jr Webb, Paul Bywaters•Local Government Studies•2018

Obras citantes distintas5
Citas por año0,71
Intervalo de citas2019 - 2024 (6)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae