When science meets geopolitics
Global AI research network transformation (2000–2025)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17600381 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marina Yue Zhang (0000-0002-9957-050X, Australia–China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney , 123 Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2007, corresponding author), Shengpeng Wang (0000-0003-2024-7396, College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University , Hangzhou 311300), Yanhui Wei (0000-0002-4883-7876, School of Management, Shandong Technology and Business University , Yantai 264005), Zuanxu Chen (0009-0008-3407-3546, Sichuan Academy Of Social Sciences) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science and Public Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0302-3427 • E-ISSN: 1471-5430 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/scipol/scag017 |
| OpenAlex | W7141484697 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 29 |
Global AI research has shifted from an open, collaborative enterprise to a domain shaped by strategic rivalry. This study examines the evolution of international AI research collaboration networks from 2000 to 2025 through bibliometric and social network analysis of 1.4 million publications from the Web of Science. We identify four phases: a unipolar Western-led network (2000–2009), China’s rise and bipolar emergence (2010–2016), peak collaboration amid geopolitical strain (2017–2021), and strategic bifurcation (2022–2025). The findings reveal asymmetric centrality: China dominates in publication volume, while the US retains structural influence. Rather than emerging solely from intrinsic scientific dynamics, collaboration patterns are increasingly shaped by political interventions and techno-industrial strategies. Technological breakthroughs catalyse investment cycles that reshape global networks, while geopolitical forces disrupt established partnerships. The study highlights the policy imperative to support multi-polar research ecosystems, empower intermediary ‘bridge’ nations, and pursue nuanced strategies that balance competition with sustained international cooperation
China · Geopolitics · Politics · Social network analysis · COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, Migration · Digital Education and Society · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Machine learning
Scale-Free Networks
Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science
Deep learning
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Internationalizing AI
National research impact is driven by global collaboration, not rising performance
Scientific globalism during a global crisis
The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence
A bibliometric analysis of Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja (2007–2019)
Software survey
| Highly cited | No |
|---|