Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mural painting and (ir)reproducibility in the age of AI

Bibliographic Data

ID17675930
AuthorsCatarina Lira Pereira (0000-0003-0552-3946, Universidade do Porto, corresponding author), Domingos Loureiro (0000-0002-5317-6726, Universidade do Porto), Diana Costa (0000-0002-5049-4518, Centro Universitário Belas Artes de São Paulo)
Year2026
Volume41
Issue6
Pages5687-5701
Publication date2026-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAI & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0951-5666 • E-ISSN: 1435-5655
PublisherSpringer Nature (PUBLISHER • SG)
DOI10.1007/s00146-026-02916-y
OpenAlexW7133132066
LanguageEN
References cited11

This paper examines mural painting in the digital and AI age and asks what follows for reproducibility, authenticity, and cultural meaning. The point of departure is Benjamin’s aura, recast through three linked ideas: situated aura, as the co-presence of body, work, and site; file aura, as the value an image acquires through capture, addressability, and circulation; and situational non-commutability, as the limit that blocks substitution of one order by the other. Methodologically, the study relies on a qualitative, theoretical–analytical approach across esthetics, media studies, and the philosophy of technology, and then tests the claims against emblematic cases in mural practice and adjacent domains. The analysis shows that place and scale do more than frame murals; they co-produce experience. Material relief and process traces—time pressure, contact with passersby, heat or dust and the fatigue they induce—enter the surface as indices of a lived interval. Community work binds content to local memory. High-fidelity capture may raise file aura; it does not rebuild those conditions as the same world. Translation changes order, not medium. The study outlines how authenticity persists and adapts under pervasive mediation: mural painting endures as a strategy of irreproducibility because it anchors experience in site, scale, material, community, and performance—vectors that resist translation into code without essential loss. The paper closes with practical implications: design choices that strengthen non-commutability, documentation protocols that treat context as part of the work, and curatorial, technological, and policy frameworks that reinforce situated aura rather than attempt to replace it

Context (archaeology) · Documentation · Mural · Painting · Performing arts · Representation (politics) · Situated · Situational ethics · Art, Politics, and Modernism · Public Spaces through Art · Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation

  • Technology

    Robert Hullot-Kentor•Mapping Benjamin•2003

  • One Place after Another

    Miwon Kwon•One Place after Another•2002

  • Generative AI and human labor

    Open Access•Syed AbuMusab•AI & Society•2024

  • The work of art in the age of generative AI

    Open Access•Sungjin Park•AI & Society•2025

  • How to Interpret Isis's Heritage Destruction

    Benjamin Isakhan•Current History•2018

  • The Work of Art in the Age of Automated Creativity

    Open Access•Konrad Wojnowski•Praktyka Teoretyczna•2024

  • Work of art in the Age of Its AI Reproduction

    Open Access•Ignas Kalpokas•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2023

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae