Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Readability assessment of English translations of Chinese classics

A study based on XGBoost and BP neural networks

Bibliographic Data

ID17832148
AuthorsLiwei Yang (0009-0008-7189-4482, Northeast Forestry University, corresponding author), Guijun Zhou (0009-0000-2117-4403, Heilongjiang International University)
Year2026
Volume13
Issue1
Publication date2026-03-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1057/s41599-026-06878-w
OpenAlexW7135384578
LanguageEN
References cited18

The English translation of Chinese classics is crucial for cultural dissemination and East-West exchanges, but assessing their readability poses challenges due to linguistic and cultural differences. This study applies natural language processing and machine learning to evaluate the readability of five English translations of The Analects by D. C. Lau, James Legge, William Jennings, Edward Slingerland, and Burton Watson. Using a corpus with 4236 lines for model training and 2824 held-out lines for application and reporting, 114 readability features were analyzed. Two machine learning techniques, XGBoost and BP Neural Network, were employed to develop customized readability models. The results, evaluated using mean squared error (MSE) and R2, with Pearson correlations reported for feature screening and descriptive analysis, reveal that both models achieve high predictive performance, with the BP Neural Network slightly outperforming XGBoost. Key factors influencing readability include sentence length, syntactic structure, lexical complexity, and lexical density (used as a proxy for information density). This study offers a novel method for assessing and improving the readability of multiple English translations of The Analects. While the approach may be potentially transferable to other Chinese classics, such generalization requires further validation

Artificial neural network · Natural language · Readability · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Text Readability and Simplification · Translation Studies and Practices

  • A new readability yardstick.

    Rudolph Flesch•Journal of Applied Psychology•1948

  • Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel

    J Peter Kincaid, Jr Fishburne et al.•1975

  • From Monologue to Dialogue

    Youlan Tao•Translation Review•2018

  • Understanding the Analects of Confucius

    Peimin Ni•Understanding the Analects of…•2017

  • How Much Does Lookahead Matter for Disambiguation? Partial Arabic Diacritization Case Study

    Open Access•Saeed Esmail, Kfir Bar et al.•Computational Linguistics•2022

  • Supervised and Unsupervised Neural Approaches to Text Readability

    Open Access•Matej Martinc, Senja Pollak et al.•Computational Linguistics•2021

  • Teaching linguistic argumentation through a writing-intensive approach

    Open Access•Panayiotis A Pappas, M Taboada et al.•Language•2019

  • Assessing Text Readability Using Cognitively Based Indices

    Open Access•Scott A Crossley, J C Greenfield et al.•TESOL Quarterly•2008

  • On the Failure of Readability Formulas to Define Readable Texts

    Alice Davison, Robert N Kantor et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•1982

  • Revisiting simplification in corpus-based translation studies

    Open Access•Thibaut François, Thomas François et al.•Meta Journal des traducteurs•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae