Further Discussion on Pacifists vs. Psychologists
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 18940024 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Withall (University of Delaware, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1951 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 458-458 |
| Publication date | 1951-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Psychologist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/h0058696 |
| OpenAlex | W2010832307 |
| Language | EN |
Letter to the editor regarding the letter from Dr. Gladstone and Dr. Kelman on the pacifist position (American Psychologist, 1951, 6, 127- 128). As a social scientist and an affiliate of the Society of Friends I wish to concur in the ideas and suggestions expressed by Dr. Gladstone and Dr. Kelman. They have well stated what many of us have been thinking for a long time. Ought we not to elevate the assumptions which guide the thinking of many people in the field of international relations to the level of hypotheses and begin to examine and test them in the light of the available data? (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Psychoanalysis · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Health and Conflict Studies · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |