Looking for politically like‐minded partners
Self‐presentation and partner‐vetting strategies on dating apps
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 18955480 |
|---|---|
| Authors | L S Chan (0000-0002-9153-2234, School of Journalism and Communication The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 703-720 |
| Publication date | 2021-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Personal Relationships (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1350-4126 • E-ISSN: 1475-6811 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/pere.12375 |
| OpenAlex | W3147722429 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 33 |
Scholarship on politics and romance has found that political homophily between couples is due to social sorting (i.e., people seeking politically like‐minded partners from the outset). However, it remains unclear how people do so in an online context. Based on interviews with dating app users in Hong Kong, this study explores individuals' self‐presentation and partner‐vetting strategies in their quests for politically like‐minded partners in a highly polarized political environment. The study reveals that political participation and knowledge have become sexual capital on dating apps, and self‐censorship has begun to emerge in citizens' private use of social media in the city. Finally, this study proposes a typology along the dimensions of effectiveness and riskiness to categorize various self‐presentation and partner‐vetting strategies
Advertising · Business · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Scholarship · Scrutiny · Social media · Sociology · Typology · Vetting · Gender, Feminism, and Media · History · Law · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Psychology · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology · Social Psychology
Good People and Getting Along
When politics meets dating
Bored ghosts in the dating app assemblage
Displaying health cues on online dating profiles
Sociocultural Tensions and Technological Mediation
Dating apps
Trusting dating algorithms in love and politics
Politically Motivated Retroactive Self-Censorship on Social Media
Hong Kong
The Progression of College Student Romantic Relationship Development
The elephant in the room? Considerations of politics among older adult daters
How dating apps fail sexual minorities
Romantic relationship initiation and escalation through mobile dating apps
Do bedroom eyes wear political glasses? The role of politics in human mate attraction
First Comes Love, Then Comes Google
Transmission of social attitudes.
Online Dating
Self-Presentation in Online Personals
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Plenty of (Similar) fish in the sea
Information-Seeking Strategies, Uncertainty, and Computer-Mediated Communication
Sexual Fields
Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context
Making meaning of parenting from the perspective of alienated parents
Political opposites do not attract
Ambivalence in networked intimacy
Is love politically blind? The role that the romantic partner plays for young adults’ socio-political interest
Race-Based Sexual Preferences in a Sample of Online Profiles of Urban Men Seeking Sex with Men
Online dating profiles, first-date interactions, and the enhancement of communication satisfaction and desires for future interaction
Political Homophily in Social Relationships
The Politics of Mate Choice
The Politics of Beauty
Five Demands and (Not Quite) Beyond
Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity
Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity
Dating in the Time of #BlackLivesMatter
"Personal Preference" as the New Racism
How Many Interviews Are Enough
Language and Social Psychology
Vetting and Letting
| Citations per year | 3.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |