‘Dirty work’ down under
A comment on Janice Irvine’s ‘Is sexuality research “dirty work”?’
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 18973392 |
|---|---|
| Authors | G W Dowsett (0000-0002-0841-3964, La Trobe University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 5-6 |
| Pages | 657-661 |
| Publication date | 2014-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sexualities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1363-4607 • E-ISSN: 1461-7382 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1363460714535800 |
| OpenAlex | W2319562372 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
This commentary considers the key arguments of Janice Irvine's article as they pertain to Australia's sexuality researchers. It also discusses other sexuality research outside the USA and suggests that sexuality research may be a particular problem for the USA but some of the same issues apply elsewhere
Computer security · Epistemology · Human sexuality · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Computer Science · Engineering · Gender Studies · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Philosophy · Psychology · Sex work and related issues · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
The Other Sex Work
Rethinking Risk in Adults’ Engagement with Sexual Digital Imagery
Keeping a low profile and queering Chinese academia
Combining ‘sex-as-dirty work’ and ‘CMM’ frameworks for recruiting cisgender, heterosexual men for a study on sex, sexuality, and intimacy
It’s just a penis’
Chinese academia wouldn’t be tolerant of my research’
The price of pulchritude, the cost of concupiscence
| Citations per year | 0.64 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2023 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |