The Diversity of Classifier Inventory in Mandarin Dialects

A Case Study of Baoding

Bibliographic Data

ID19071995
AuthorsNa Song (0000-0002-0407-3309, INalCO, Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie orientale, UMR 8563. Email : [email protected], corresponding author), Marc Allassonnière-Tang (0000-0002-9057-642X, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR 5596. Email : [email protected])
Year2021
Volume52
Issue2
Pages115-132
Publication date2021-11-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueFaits de langues (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1244-5460 • E-ISSN: 1958-9514
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/19589514-05202001
OpenAlexW3209851472
LanguageEN
References cited16

Our study compares Standard Mandarin (the Beijing dialect used in spoken and written registers) with the Mandarin dialect of Baoding (one of the Mandarin dialects belonging to the Jì-lŭ Mandarin group, Hebei-Shandong). Standard Mandarin and Baoding are geographically and phylogenetically closely related, but they differ in terms of their classifier system, as Standard Mandarin resorts to a wide array of sortal classifiers whereas Baoding only uses one general classifier. We first provide a detailed analysis of the unconventional classifier system in Baoding. Then, we compare the lexical and discourse functions of sortal classifiers in Standard Mandarin and Baoding. We show that Standard Mandarin does present a certain level of convergence with its geographical neighbour Baoding. However, these varieties also display significant divergences, as several lexical and discourse functions typically associated with classifier systems cannot be fulfilled by the only classifier found in Boading

Beijing · China · Linguistics · Mandarin Chinese · Natural language processing · Speech recognition · Standard Chinese · Categorization, perception, and language · Computer Science · History · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

Tools

Open DOI