Rural roots, urban branches
The influence of place attachment on hybrid entrepreneurs
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19220503 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joseph Macharia (0000-0002-5152-5208, Queensland University of Technology, corresponding author), Shane Mathews (0000-0002-5365-6586, Queensland University of Technology), Sandeep Salunke (0000-0002-0253-5522, Queensland University of Technology) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 126 |
| Pages | 104265-104265 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Rural Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0743-0167 • E-ISSN: 1873-1392 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104265 |
| OpenAlex | W7163823028 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 39 |
Urban professionals and diaspora actors who retain salaried employment while financing, supervising and periodically visiting rural farms are increasingly important but heterogeneous participants in rural transformation. We conceptualise this phenomenon as a spatially stretched form of hybrid entrepreneurship and examine how emotional and instrumental place attachment shape rural venture engagement in Kenya. Drawing on an abductive qualitative multiple-case study of 27 urban-based and diaspora Kenyan farmer-entrepreneurs, we show that managing rural ventures at a distance is organised through four configurations of place attachment: emotionally grounded engagement, blended emotional-instrumental engagement, socially mediated rural engagement and instrumentally driven engagement. These configurations show that urban-funded rural ventures are not a single category. Some participants use farming to sustain family heritage, cultural continuity and rural belonging; others combine commercial goals with community-oriented value creation; some are drawn in through peer influence, family obligation and community expectations; and others approach rural land primarily as a productive or portfolio asset. Distance, digital oversight, civic roles and prior rural ties operate as contextual conditions through which attachment is expressed, rather than deterministic causes of venture behaviour. The study extends hybrid entrepreneurship research by showing that hybridity is not only occupational but also spatially stretched across urban employment and rural enterprise. It advances place-attachment research by showing how emotional and instrumental attachments combine among already place-connected actors and contributes to rural studies by explaining heterogeneous forms of distant rural embeddedness in the Kenyan agricultural context
Aging in place · Place attachment · Place identity · Rural area · Indigenous and Place-Based Education · Place Attachment and Urban Studies · Rural development and sustainability
Rural entrepreneurship in Europe
An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers
Africa's changing farm size distribution patterns
Resources and bridging
The best of both worlds
Hybrid Entrepreneurship
The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship
Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research
Linking place preferences with place meaning
Place attachment
Part-time entrepreneurship and financial constraints
You never farm alone”
The remapping of rural digitalisation
Territorial capital and place attachment
Structural transformation or elite land capture? The growth of “emergent” farmers in Zambia
Growth Regimes over Time and Space
Farming as a livelihood source for the urban poor of Nakuru, Kenya
Conditions for doing business in rural areas
Digital rurality
Tied to the land
Defining place attachment
Is Out of Sight out of Mind? Place Attachment among Rural Youth Out-Migrants
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |