Rebranding Cheapness for Colonial Consumption

The Strategies of Tan Kah Kee and Lee Kong Chian in Marketing British Malayan Canned Pineapples

Bibliographic Data

ID19224573
AuthorsYen Nie Yong (0000-0002-2100-8162, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages1-32
Publication date2026-05-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnterprise & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1467-2227 • E-ISSN: 1467-2235
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/eso.2026.10117
OpenAlexW7160956503
LanguageEN
References cited30

In the early twentieth century, the Malayan pineapple was the cheapest but most consumed canned fruit in Britain, most of which was produced by local Chinese enterprises in British Malaya. Current historiography of the Malayan pineapple industry has highlighted its lack of automation and branding that made the canned pineapples low quality and therefore cheap; a consequence of colonial commodity production framework that prioritized rubber exports. A key assumption is that Britain’s high demand for Malayan pineapples was mainly driven by the harsh economic conditions during the Depression years. However, using previously unexamined colonial newspaper reports and archival sources on the Empire Marketing Board, this study sheds light on how two representatives of the pineapple industry—Tan Kah Kee and Lee Kong Chian—actively leveraged colonial ties and production cheapness to corner imperial markets. This study’s contribution is two-fold. First, it expands the Malayan pineapple industry’s current historiography by situating it within the broader debates on imperial marketing, commodity chains, and local entrepreneurship. By focusing on the marketing strategies which Chinese entrepreneurs devised within a colonial framework, it adds nuance to the literature on local entrepreneurship and the trajectories of a secondary commodity sector in British colonies. Second, it challenges the predominantly ethnically essentialist readings of Chinese business strategies under colonialism of Southeast Asia, by demonstrating how intra-ethnic cooperation was not always effective in business modernization. In this case, leveraging colonial and imperial ties to navigate colonial logic in commodity trade and production was more useful, even though its success was transient

Business history · Colonialism · Commodity · Empire · Entrepreneurship · Historiography · Newspaper · Asian Studies and History · Culinary Culture and Tourism · Historical Economic and Social Studies

Tools

Open DOI