Surviving publication pressure collaboratively? Peer co-authorship habitus and capital formation among Chinese doctoral students in humanities and social sciences
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19229299 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shuzhen Chen (0000-0001-9447-7229, Chinese University of Hong Kong), Kun Dai (0000-0001-6947-7710, Chinese University of Hong Kong, corresponding author), Alan Chi Keung Cheung (Chinese University of Hong Kong), Alan Cheung (0000-0002-9013-1586) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-12 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-1560 • E-ISSN: 1573-174X |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10734-025-01615-9 |
| OpenAlex | W7135092173 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 37 |
Despite growing research interest in humanities and social sciences (HSS) doctoral students’ publishing practices, little is known about how they navigate peer co-authorship practices in the context of Chinese competitive academic field. Grounded in Bourdieu’s thinking tools, this exploratory qualitative study draws on interviews with 29 HSS doctoral students to explore how peer co-authorship serves as a strategy for different types of capital accumulation. Findings reveal that co-authorship is not merely a response to publication pressure; it reflects institutionalized doxa, field hierarchies, and internalized academic habitus. Driven by utilitarian and humanistic motivations, three strategic logics emerge: 1) partnering with like-minded and complementary peers; 2) collaborating with peers with prestigious affiliations and strong publication profiles to enhance symbolic capital and prestige economy; and 3) internalizing the distinctions between international and domestic writing practices. Academic conferences enable them to recognize collaborators and strengthen professional interactions with domestic editors. Doctoral students expand social and scientific capital while also gaining emotional support and resilience through co-authorship. Thus, peer co-authorship becomes a key approach to accumulate and convert different forms of capital, thereby helping students advance trajectories within Chinese academic field
Context (archaeology) · Field (mathematics) · Habitus · Higher education · Prestige · Psychological resilience · Publishing · Social capital · Symbolic capital · Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions · Higher Education Governance and Development · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education
Building the world-class research universities
On the shoulders of students? The contribution of PhD students to the advancement of knowledge
The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013)
The fourth age of research
Team size matters
Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling
The relationship between coauthorship and the research impact of medical doctoral students
Doctoral writing for publication
Peer-mentoring and doctoral student retention
Co-authorship between doctoral students and supervisors
Revealing dynamic co-authorship structure in the social sciences through blockmodeling
Research collaboration networks in maturing academic environments
Publish and flourish
The prestige economy of higher education journals
Field-level differences in paper and author characteristics across all fields of science in Web of Science, 2000–2020
Learning together through collaborative writing
Outline of a Theory of Practice
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
The Logic of Practice
Heavy mountains’ for Chinese humanities and social science academics in the quest for world-class universities
Responding to the neoliberal and managerial changes
Write on! Cultivating social capital in a writing group for doctoral education and beyond
Guanxi, social capital theory and beyond
The ethics of multiple authorship
PhD merit needs to be defined by more than just publications
Nothing but publishing
Supervisors matter, but what about peers? The distinct contributions of quality supervision and peer support to doctoral students' research experience
The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason
Turning Social Capital into Scientific Capital
| Highly cited | No |
|---|