Reconstructing Old Chinese *‐ts Using Han‐Time Material
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19230778 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julien Baley (0000-0003-1056-6211, University of London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Transactions of the Philological Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0079-1636 • E-ISSN: 1467-968X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-968x.70025 |
| OpenAlex | W7160378682 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
Baxter & Sagart (2014b) reconstruct *‐Vt‐s on the basis of Middle Chinese reflexes in ‐jH (from some OC *‐s) coupled with either etymological or graphic connections to words in Middle Chinese ‐t . This approach, while perfectly sound, can suffer from lack of etymological or graphic data, leading to missed reconstructions. Since Old Chinese *‐ts syllables retained an *‐s in Late Han Chinese, long after OC *‐Vs and *‐ks had lost *‐s (Baxter 1992: 569), it is possible to use transcriptional (Baley et al. 2023; Baley & Hill, forthcoming) and rhyming evidence (Luó & Zhōu 1958) dated up to the Eastern Hàn 東漢 dynasty to establish an Old Chinese *‐ts reconstruction for words, respectively, transcribing a foreign ‐s or rhyming with other *‐ts words. In the present article, using a mix of network graph methods, graphic variants found in received and excavated texts, rhyme book glosses, and cognates in related languages, we demonstrate the validity of using Hàn 漢 rhyming material to reconstruct an OC *‐ts final. In the process, we propose new reconstructions for several characters previously reconstructed as *‐js by Baxter & Sagart. This proposal, in turn, opens the possibility of revisiting other syllable types and problematic reconstructions
Chinese characters · Chinese language · Old Chinese · Rhyme · Syllable · Chinese history and philosophy · Eurasian Exchange Networks · Space Technology and Applications
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |