Managerial resistance to digital workplace surveillance in a local government authority
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19233458 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Oliver George Kayas, Efpraxia D Zamani (0000-0003-3110-7495, Durham University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 102162 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Government Information Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0740-624X • E-ISSN: 1872-9517 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.giq.2026.102162 |
| OpenAlex | W7164754667 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
Workplace surveillance is an increasingly pervasive feature of contemporary organisations, yet research overwhelmingly positions employees as its primary subjects and agents of resistance. Managers, by contrast, are implicitly framed as a homogeneous group who design, implement, and sustain surveillance. We argue that such framing ignores the complex positions managers simultaneously occupy as implementers, mediators, and potential subjects of surveillance, and further obscures situations in which they themselves are monitored, oppose surveillance, or actively engage in resisting it. Drawing on a grounded theory study of a UK local government authority, we examine how and why managers resist digitally augmented surveillance systems, revealing three interrelated resistance strategies: shielding employees from surveillance, obfuscating data to undermine system integrity, and deploying discursive practices to contest surveillance legitimacy. These strategies are simultaneously shaped by self-protective and value-driven motivations. By integrating sociotechnical systems theory with public service ethics, we develop a conceptual framework that repositions managers as agentive, morally reasoning actors navigating the contested terrain of digital control. The findings advance interdisciplinary understanding of resistance and ethics in digitally mediated public sector organisations, and respond to calls for research that recognises managerial diversity and conceptualises resistance as a situated sociotechnical process
Digital government · Local authority · Local government · Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Employer Branding and e-HRM
The complexities of digitization and street-level discretion
Elements of surveillance
Organization, Surveillance and the Body
Lost in translation how public managers across hierarchical levels shape customization depending on their managerial or professional identity
The end of the world as we know it – public ethics in times of de-standardization and individualization
Understanding resistance to digital surveillance
Employees' intentions toward complying with information security controls in Saudi Arabia's public organisations
Transparency and accountability in digital public services
Toward a person-environment fit framework for artificial intelligence implementation in the public sector
Data governance
To explore managerial issues and their implications on e-Government deployment in the public sector
Coping with digital transformation in frontline public services
Electronic monitoring and surveillance in call centres
Social Media
Electronic surveillance and cohesive teams
A compliance—integrity framework for ethics management
Workplace surveillance
A Tack in the Shoe
Twenty-five years of accountability research in public administration
Public service ethics in a changing world
Mitigating employee resistance and achieving well-being in digital transformation
Public accountability and auditing
AI-augmented government transformation
An Empirical Assessment of the Intrusiveness and Reasonableness of Emerging Work Surveillance Technologies in the Public Sector
What Determines Ethical Behavior in Public Organizations
ICT-enabled public sector organisational transformation
Research on Ethics and Integrity in Public Administration
IT Is Watching
Sousveillance
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |