Pathways for Value Chains to Strengthen Sustainable Development in Mountain Regions
A European Cross‐Case Analysis Based on Stakeholders' Perceptions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19235240 |
|---|---|
| Authors | María Del Mar Delgado-Serrano (0000-0003-0171-6097, WEARE—Water, Environmental and Agricultural Resources Economics Research Group Universidad de Córdoba Córdoba Spain), María Mar Delgado-Serrano (University of Córdoba), Macario Rodríguez-Entrena (0000-0002-9339-439X, WEARE—Water, Environmental and Agricultural Resources Economics Research Group Universidad de Córdoba Córdoba Spain), Anastasio J Villanueva (0000-0002-1384-8372, WEARE—Water, Environmental and Agricultural Resources Economics Research Group Universidad de Córdoba Córdoba Spain, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-16 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sustainable Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0968-0802 • E-ISSN: 1099-1719 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sd.71059 |
| OpenAlex | W7154576132 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 58 |
Mountain areas are hotspots of high natural and cultural value, but they face sustainability challenges. This research offers a quantitative cross‐case analysis of 21 case studies from mountain regions across 14 European countries, examining how local stakeholders perceive the contribution of mountain value chains to sustainable development. Using a cocreation process, seven objectives were defined and ranked via best–worst scaling choice experiments. A latent class model revealed four distinct development pathways: Ecological prioritisation , focusing on resilience and local assets; Social prioritisation , emphasising well‐being, cooperation, and human capital; Cooperative sustainability, valuing cooperation and sustainable use of local assets; and Balanced sustainability, assigning similar importance to all the objectives. For all pathways, inclusiveness was rated as the least important objective. These results demonstrate that stakeholder priorities vary significantly, suggesting that ‘one‐size‐fits‐all’ policies are ineffective. Our findings support the design of context‐specific governance mechanisms to enhance the sustainability of European mountain regions through more targeted and stakeholder‐aligned interventions
Corporate governance · Perception · Psychological resilience · Stakeholder · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research · Mining and Resource Management · Rural development and sustainability
Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best–worst choices
Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Adoption of greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture
Role of the neo-rural phenomenon and the new peasantry in agroecological transitions
Local actors’ perspectives on sustainable food value chains
Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social–ecological systems perspective
Trade-offs between conservation and development in community-based management initiatives
Policy strategies to foster the resilience of mountain social-ecological systems under uncertain global change
Towards poor‐centred value chain for sustainable development
Consumer preferences toward new circular bioeconomy agri‐food products
Sustainable development
Adaptation action and research in glaciated mountain systems
Navigating shades of social capital and trust to leverage opportunities for rural innovation
Understanding farm generational renewal and its influencing factors in Europe
Translating local stakeholders' perception in rural development strategies under uncertainty conditions
Characterizing value chains’ contribution to resilient and sustainable development in European mountain areas
Envisioning upland futures
Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital
Agricultural decline and sustainable development on mountain areas in Greece
Farmers’ heterogeneous preferences towards results-based environmental policies
Which sustainability objectives are difficult to achieve? The mid-term evaluation of predicted scenarios in remote mountain agricultural landscapes in Slovakia
Delineating Europe's mountains
Value chains for sustainable mountain development
Participatory Guarantee Systems
Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments
Best worst discrete choice experiments in health
Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|