Comparison of injection well patterns for remediating benzene‐contaminated groundwater
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19270940 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul F Hudak (0000-0001-8299-136X, University of North Texas, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 641-652 |
| Publication date | 1999-08-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-7233 • E-ISSN: 1026-7476 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00207239908711229 |
| OpenAlex | W2105448303 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
Ten alternative injection well patterns and a no‐action plan were evaluated for bioremediating benzene‐contaminated groundwater. Evaluations were made for a silty‐sand aquifer using a contaminant fate and transport model. Wells injected water containing 8 mg/L dissolved oxygen. The study's objective was to rank the alternative schemes based upon mass of contaminant removed and area of residual groundwater contamination. Interior configurations with injection wells at areas of high benzene concentration outperformed the other remediation schemes. Interior wells supply oxygen quickly to areas of a plume where it is most needed. Alternative configurations rely upon groundwater to transport the oxygen, an inefficient process. No action was the least effective strategy
Aquifer · Benzene · Contaminated groundwater · Contamination · Environmental remediation · Geotechnical engineering · Groundwater · Groundwater remediation · Plume · Remedial action · Chemistry · Ecology · Environmental Chemistry · Environmental Engineering · Environmental Science · Geology · Groundwater flow and contamination studies · Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants · Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
| Highly cited | No |
|---|