Perceptions of boundaries and cultural influences in Qatar
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19273041 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Suhaila Ghuloum (0000-0002-1384-4179, Hamad Medical Corporation), Abdulbari Bener (0000-0002-7902-5803, Department of Public Health & Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar), Michael Lamport Commons (Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, USA), Patrice Marie Miller (Department of Psychology, Salem State College, Salem, USA), F Tuna Burgut (Department of Public Health & Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar), Dinesh Bhugra (0000-0002-0613-2480, King's College London) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 199-206 |
| Publication date | 2013-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Social Psychiatry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-7640 • E-ISSN: 1741-2854 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0020764011431799 |
| PMID | 22222849 |
| OpenAlex | W2058006345 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 5 |
BACKGROUND: Boundary issues, which regularly arise in therapy, can present dilemmas for most clinicians. There has been substantial literature on boundary excursions in clinician-patient relationships, however, very little empirical research exists and is documented. As mental health researchers, we need to investigate a wide range of sensitive topics to enhance our understanding of the many issues that arise in the psychotherapeutic frame. AIMS: We set out to empirically explore perceptions of what may constitute a boundary violation among the mental health staff in the State of Qatar and their views on the subject. RESULTS: A total of 50 participants (24 psychiatrists, 2 doctorate level psychologists, 24 psychiatric nurses) responded with a response rate of 80%. Participants rated each possible boundary violation according to its degree of harm and professional unacceptability. Three distinct groupings of boundary violations were obtained: (1) core, consisting of the most serious violations; (2) disclosure and greeting behaviour, involving disclosure of information about the therapist and greeting behaviour; and (3) separation of therapist and client lives, involving encounters between therapists and clients outside of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to ascertain these dilemmas so that these theoretical models can be integrated in clinical practice
Boundary (topology) · Empirical research · Harm · Mental health · Perception · Psychiatry · Psychotherapist · Set (abstract data type) · Clinical Psychology · Counseling Practices and Supervision · Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |