Let it go
Relationship autonomy predicts pro‐relationship responses to partner transgressions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19280965 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Benjamin W Hadden (0000-0001-8386-3116, University of Houston, corresponding author), Zachary G Baker (0000-0001-5345-7643, University of Houston), C Raymond Knee (0000-0002-1842-3525, University of Houston) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 868-887 |
| Publication date | 2018-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3506 • E-ISSN: 1467-6494 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jopy.12362 |
| PMID | 29171873 |
| OpenAlex | W2770303195 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 44 |
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present research is to better understand how relationship autonomy-having more self-determined reasons for being committed to a relationship-contributes to pro-relationship responses to transgressions in romantic relationships (e.g., forgiveness and accommodation). METHOD: Study 1 employed a cross-sectional design (N = 350) and Study 2 used a weekly diary (N = 121) to test associations between relationship autonomy and pro-relationship responses to transgressions. Studies 3 and 4 utilized dyadic designs (Study 3: N = 200 couples, 400 individuals; Study 4: N = 275 couples, 550 individuals) to determine how both partners' relationship autonomy is associated with pro-relationship responses. RESULTS: Results revealed that relationship autonomy is robustly associated with pro-relationship responses to transgressions, both as general tendencies and as responses to idiosyncratic transgressions. Results of actor-partner interdependence model (APIM) analyses in Studies 3 and 4 provide evidence that one's partner's relationship autonomy is important for promoting pro-relationship responses as well. Study 4 also found that people perceive that partners respond better to transgressions if their partner is high in relationship autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: This research provides consistent and compelling evidence that the degree of self-determination underlying commitment is important for understanding how people respond to transgressions in their relationships, beyond their current levels of commitment
Autonomy · Developmental psychology · Forgiveness · Interpersonal relationship · Partner effects · Positive relationship · Relationship education · Romance · Test (biology) · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Forgiveness and Related Behaviors · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Psychology · Social Psychology
Different bumps in the road
The link between sacrifice and relational and personal well-being
The Association Between Autonomy Need Satisfaction and Perceived Romantic Relationship Quality
The Interaction of Health Stressors and Power Imbalances in Partnered Women
Why are we together? A dyadic longitudinal investigation of relationship motivation, goal progress, and adjustment
Relationship Between Teachers' Interpersonal Behavior and Students' Motivation to Form and Maintain Relationships with Their Teachers
Reflections on a registered report replicating a body of dyadic cross‐sectional research
The ebb and flow of sexual well-being
The relational dynamics of anger and shame
Helping clients forgive
Autonomy and Need Satisfaction in Close Relationships
Being Committed
The Dark Side of Forgiveness
Interpersonal relations
Forgiveness Increases Meaning in Life
Autonomous Motivation, Controlled Motivation, and Goal Progress
Changing relationship growth belief
The kiss of the porcupines
The Investment Model Scale
Forgiveness in marriage
Thinking about commitment
The reduction of psychological aggression across varied interpersonal contexts through repentance and forgiveness
Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships
Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships
Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect
The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits
Self-determination and conflict in romantic relationships
Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships
Loving freedom
The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being
Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships
Dealing with betrayal in close relationships
Self-control and accommodation in close relationships
When forgiving enhances psychological well-being
Toward a motivational model of couple happiness
Accommodation processes in close relationships
The road to forgiveness
Interpersonal forgiveness, trust, and the investment model of commitment
An Investigation of the Rusbult Investment Model of Commitment in Relationships with Pets
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |