Determination of the Regression Coefficients and Their Associated Standard Errors in Hierarchical Regression Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19291981 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Tisak (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 185-201 |
| Publication date | 1994-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Multivariate Behavioral Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0027-3171 • E-ISSN: 1532-7906 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1207/s15327906mbr2902_4 |
| PMID | 26745027 |
| OpenAlex | W2056470532 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
Hierarchical regression analysis is potentially a very useful statistical technique for establishing the significance of sets of predictor variables. However, when a hierarchical analysis which is based on theory is performed, some estimation procedures for the regression coefficients and their associated standard errors are potentially inappropriate. Specifically, the hierarchical regression equations, the incremental or hierarchical tests, and the parameter estimation of this procedure may not correspond. This problem is investigated by the development of four approaches (simultaneous, stagewise, orthogonal, and hierarchical) of estimation to the analysis. For each method, regression, coefficient estimators and their standard errors are determined. By comparison of these approaches, the use of orthogonalized sets of predictor variates or a modification to a series of simultaneous analyses are recommended as the most sensible technique for a theory driven hierarchical analysis
Estimator · Linear regression · Multilevel model · Polynomial regression · Regression · Regression analysis · Regression diagnostic · Regression dilution · Standard error · Standardized coefficient · Statistics · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Computer Science · Mathematics
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1998 - 1998 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |