Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Paradox of Scientific Progress in the Evolutionary Dimension

Bibliographic Data

ID19334239
AuthorsAlexander Yu Antonovskiy (0000-0003-4209-8213, Weatherford College), Raisa E Barash (0000-0002-5899-973X, Weatherford College)
Year2021
Issue11
Pages83-94
Publication date2021-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueVoprosy Filosofii (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0042-8744 • E-ISSN: 3034-1833
PublisherInstitute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.21146/0042-8744-2021-11-83-94
OpenAlexW3209071580
LanguageEN

The article proposes a solution to the paradox of scientific progress, formulated by Max Weber. Science formulates true and objective judgments, and only this distinguishes it from the world of value judgments, ideology, religion, art. On the other hand, the “lifespan of truths” is extremely small and any statement about scientific progress looks unconvincing just in comparison with the pro­gress of value discourses, where each stage of development (style or work of art), if not replaced by the “best” at least they retain or even increase their value over the centuries. A way out of this paradox, according to the authors, can be offered by a socio-evolutionary interpretation of science, where the “criterion” of a better (or more grounded) theory is viewed as “fitness”, as the ability to respond to the challenge of the external environment, to which the best theory adapts bet­ter, and as a consequence is selected. The article is devoted to the problems that the biologically based general theory of evolution is facing today when it is ex­trapolated to the problem of scientific progress. The question is investigated in what sense scientific theories can be interpreted as replacing each other and competing with each other by analogy with organic formations (genotypes, phe­notypes, populations); what the external environment of scientific communica­tion is and what institutions are responsible for the selection of the best theories; about the extent to which the autonomous mechanisms of scientific evolution are differentiated, namely, the mechanisms of random variation, natural selection and stabilization of newly acquired traits. The authors analyze the solutions to these problems in the concepts of causal individuation of the scientific theories of David Hull, the concept of semantic individuation of Stephen Gould’s theory, and the possibilities of reconciliation and synthesis of these evolutionary ap­proaches in the system-communicative theory of evolution by Niklas Luhmann

Analogy · Epistemology · Ideology · Interpretation (philosophy) · Natural selection · Political science · Politics · Population · Scientific progress · Scientific theory · Selection (genetic algorithm) · Sociology · Statement (logic) · Value (mathematics) · Computer Science · Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry · Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae