The potential of mobility as a service bundles as a mobility management tool
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19337806 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Melinda Matyas (0000-0002-6893-1595, Energy Institute, corresponding author), Maria Kamargianni (0000-0003-1320-1031, Energy Institute) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1951-1968 |
| Publication date | 2019-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Transportation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0049-4488 • E-ISSN: 1572-9435 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11116-018-9913-4 |
| OpenAlex | W2793369443 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 38 |
The Mobility as a Service (MaaS) concept has recently taken the transport industry by storm. However, as applications and research on it are limited, there is still little evidence on what this new phenomenon could bring to the transport sector. This paper aims to provide initial insights into whether MaaS product bundles (monthly subscription plans) can be used as a mobility management tool to promote shared modes. Data from an original survey, specifically designed to study MaaS plans, was used with Greater London as the case study area. The results show, that even though respondents do not prefer shared modes in their MaaS plans, a significant number of them are willing to subscribe to plans that include these modes. Once they have subscribed, over 60% of them indicated that they would be willing to try transportation modes that they previously did not use if their MaaS plans included them. These initial results show evidence that MaaS bundles can indeed be used as a mobility management tool to introduce more travelers to shared modes
Business · Mobility management · Product (mathematics) · Service (business) · Telecommunications · Transport engineering · Computer Science · Engineering · Marketing · Mathematics · Sharing Economy and Platforms · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
Sustainable mobility for whom? Tradeoffs and consumer segments on Mobility-as-a-Service platforms
A deeper look at the effects of the Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) service experience on brand loyalty and brand attachment
La gouvernance du Mobility as a Service (MaaS)
Tourist mobility packages in an island mass tourism destination
Impact of user-generated travel posts on travel decisions
Assessment of Shared Mobility Acceptability for Sustainable Transportation in Amman
Decoding mobility hubs
Generational differences in the preferences for MaaS bundles
Behavioral modeling of on-demand mobility services
Complementing or competing with public transit? Evaluating the parameter sensitivity of potential Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) urban users in Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland, and the United Kingdom with a mixed choice model
An approach for evaluating added values of MaaS bundles considering heterogeneous subscription willingness
Non-linear characteristics in switching intention to use a docked bike-sharing system
Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility
Investigating customers’ typical longitudinal behavioural responses in a large-scale mobility-as-a-service trial
Spatial equity implications and neighborhood indicators of ridehailing trip frequency and vehicle miles traveled in the phoenix metro region
Barriers and risks of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) adoption in cities
Rethinking urban mobility
Modelling Transport
How habits interfere with norm-directed behaviour
Impact of Carsharing on Household Vehicle Holdings
Behaviour theory and soft transport policy measures
The structure of random utility models
Incorporating social interaction into hybrid choice models
Household Mobility Tool Ownership
Survey design for exploring demand for Mobility as a Service plans
The Generalizability of Survey Experiments
Carrots versus Sticks
| Unique citing works | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,43 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 17 |