Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Self-report versus clinical ratings using the SWAP-200 in the assessment of personality disorders

Bibliographic Data

ID19347136
AuthorsEmilia Soroko (0000-0003-3527-1698, Adama Mickiewicza University, Poznań, Poland, corresponding author), Lidia Cierpiałkowska (0000-0002-3365-9851, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań), Lidia Wanda Cierpiałkowska (Adama Mickiewicza University, Poznań, Poland), Łukasz Mech (Wojewódzki Szpital dla Nerwowo i Psychicznie Chorych „Dziekanka” im. Aleksandra Piotrowskiego, Gniezno, Poland)
Year2024
Pages178-191
Publication date2024-01-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolish Psychological Bulletin (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0079-2993 • E-ISSN: 1641-7844
PublisherPolish Academy of Sciences Chancellery (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.24425/ppb.2023.148050
OpenAlexW4391351589
LanguageEN
References cited6

The relationship between self- and informant reports of personality using psychometric instruments is constantly the focus of attention for researchers in the field of clinical assessment in psychology. The research shows weak agreement between clinicians and patients’ assessments of personality disorders (PDs). The current study aimed at the convergence of measurement of PDs using the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP-200), the self-report Character Styles Questionnaire-R (CSQ-R) and Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI). Paper-pencil questionnaires were administered to 102 inpatients (88.2% female, aged 18-64, M = 38.4) in a voivodeship hospital and outpatient health care centre. The SWAP-200 allowed us to gather expert (clinician) personality ratings basing on the intensive contact with patients. Results show that only a few SWAP-200 PD scales showed low positive correlations with corresponding self-reported PD scales from the CSQ-R. With the canonical correlation analysis, we identified two functions (borderline and internalising) that described similarities between the SWAP-200 and CSQ-R. SWAP-200 Obsessive-Compulsive PD correlated negatively with BPI scales. Consistent with previous studies, the self-report and the clinical assessment were only marginally convergent. Furthermore, OCPD stands out from other disorders in that it correlates positively with health indicators and negatively with some of the other personality disorders. The highest agreement was observed in the description of Borderline PD

Personality · Personality Assessment Inventory · Personality disorders · Swap (finance) · Clinical Psychology · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Social Psychology

  • The Convergent Validity between Self and Observer Ratings of Personality

    Open Access•James J T Connolly, James J Connolly et al.•International Journal of…•2007

  • Conducting and Interpreting Canonical Correlation Analysis in Personality Research

    Alissa Sherry, Robin K Henson•Journal of Personality Assessment•2005

  • Meta-perception for pathological personality traits

    Open Access•Thomas F Oltmanns, Marci E J Gleason et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2005

  • Using the SWAP-200 with novice psychodynamic clinicians

    Cheri L Marmarosh, Kathryn Bieri et al.•Psychoanalytic Psychology•2010

  • When clinical description becomes statistical prediction

    Drew Westen, Joel Weinberger•American Psychologist•2004

  • Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (Soka) model

    Simine Vazire•Journal of Personality and Social…•2010

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae