Exploring Gender Differences in Using Metadiscourse for Political Opinion Writing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19357889 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nur Syahira Ramash, Lay Shi Ng (0000-0001-7065-4841, National University of Malaysia) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 333-356 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS) (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0127-9386 • E-ISSN: 0127-9319 |
| Publisher | SCI AND TECH UNIVERSAL INC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp333-356 |
| OpenAlex | W4385282294 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
Background and Purpose: Metadiscourse marker is one of the most commonly-used linguistic devices in persuasive writing, and it shapes writer’s arguments to the needs and expectations of the target readers. Research has consistently shown that women, on average, are less politically interested, informed, and efficacious than men. However, this does not necessarily imply that male columnists are more persuasive than female columnists when writing political opinion articles. Hence, the present study aims to investigate how male and female columnists use metadiscourse markers in political opinion writing to effectively direct their political views toward their readers. Methodology: This descriptive study used frequency analysis, comparative analysis, and a semi-structured interview with eight ardent readers to examine metadiscourse markers used by male and female columnists in their political opinion articles, as well as the impact of persuasion on their readers. 100 opinion articles about Malaysia's 14th general election were chosen from two English-language online newspaper portals in Malaysia, The Star and the New Straits Times. Findings: The findings revealed that female columnists employed more metadiscourse markers than male columnists. Respondents concluded that articles with more metadiscourse markers used in the text, particularly in the interpersonal category, appeared to be more persuasive. Furthermore, the findings indicated that female columnists presented a more convincing image than those produced by male columnists. Contributions: As research conducted on gender differences in political writing is still rare, this research provided information regarding gender preferences in using metadiscourse markers in political opinion articles. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by informing researchers and opinion writers about the many types of metadiscourse markers that may be used to establish rapport between writers and readers. Keywords: Metadiscourse markers, persuasive writing, gender, male, female, political-opinion articles. Cite as: Ramash, N. S., & Ng, L. S. (2023). Exploring gender differences in using metadiscourse for political opinion writing. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 8(1), 333-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp333-356
Linguistics · Media studies · Metadiscourse · Newspaper · Persuasion · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Educational Methods and Media Use · Language Acquisition and Education · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |