A Novel Technique for Comparing the Reliability of Multiple Peer Assessments with that of Single Teacher Assessments of Group Process Work
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19378159 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Douglas Magin (corresponding author), D J Magin |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 139-152 |
| Publication date | 2001-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-2938 • E-ISSN: 1469-297X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02602930020018971 |
| OpenAlex | W2005676782 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 19 |
(2001). A Novel Technique for Comparing the Reliability of Multiple Peer Assessments with that of Single Teacher Assessments of Group Process Work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education: Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 139-152
Higher education · Mathematics education · Peer Assessment · Peer evaluation · TUTOR · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Psychology · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Student Assessment and Feedback
Experimental evidence that exerting effort increases meaning
Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills
Group projects
Moderation of peer assessment in group projects
Peer and self‐assessment in the first year of university
Peer assessment without assessment criteria
Estimation of the Reliability of Ratings
Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education
Peer Assessment of a Group Project in a Primary Mathematics Education Course
Peer Assessment by Groups of Group Work
American Educational Research Journal, 1964-1968
The Reliability of Observational Measures
Notes and Comments
Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities
Staff and peer-group assessment of oral communication skills
Peer, self and tutor assessment
| Citations per year | 0.3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2006 - 2025 (20) |
| Highly cited | No |