Perspectives on peer-review
Eight years of Aropä
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19379334 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Helen C Purchase (0000-0001-6994-4446, University of Glasgow, corresponding author), Helen Purchase (University of Glasgow), John Hamer (University of Glasgow) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 473-487 |
| Publication date | 2018-04-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-2938 • E-ISSN: 1469-297X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02602938.2017.1359819 |
| OpenAlex | W2740148866 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 19 |
Drawing on eight years of observation and correspondence from the Aropä project, we report on the issues important to academics who conduct on-line student peer-review activities, and the features they request to support their own instructional designs. The Aropä project is unusually broad, having so far supported over 100 instructors at 20 institutions across nine countries, almost one thousand activities, and more than 36,000 individual students. As the designers, developers, maintainers and advisors of an evolving and widely used tool, we use our unique position to report on the perspectives and priorities of instructors and students in this important and developing field
Business · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Political science · Public relations · Higher Education Practises and Engagement · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback
Communities of Practice
Assessor or assessee
Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline
Rethinking feedback practices in higher education
A comparison of peer and tutor feedback
The assessment cycle
‘Now that’s the feedback I want!’ Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it
The Effect of Peer Review on Student Learning Outcomes in a Research Methods Course
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |