New Item Selection Criteria of Computerized Adaptive Testing with Exposure-Control Factor
New Item Selection Criteria of Computerized Adaptive Testing with Exposure-Control Factor
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19407409 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xiao-Yang CHENG (Jiangxi Normal University, corresponding author), Shuliang DING (0009-0007-2253-9452, Gannan Normal University, corresponding author), Shu-Liang DING, Shen-Hai YAN, Yan Shen-hai (Gannan Normal University, corresponding author), Long-Yin ZHU (Gannan Normal University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 203-212 |
| Publication date | 2012-03-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Acta Psychologica Sinica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0439-755X |
| Publisher | China Science Publishing & Media Ltd (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3724/sp.j.1041.2011.00203 |
| OpenAlex | W2329848688 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 6 |
摘要: 在计算机化自适应测验(CAT)的研究中, 制定既高效又安全的选题策略是一个追求目标。用极大项目信息量准则(MIC)选题使得测验效率高、能力估计准确, 缺点是项目调用很不均匀, 影响考试的安全; 按a分层法通过控制试题曝光率以提高考试的安全性, 但该方法可能会使测验效率略有下降, 且该方法在各层内部无法实现对区分度的调整。本文针对上述两种选题策略的优缺点, 对0-1评分下的CAT, 通过引入曝光因子、分阶段自动调整区分度的影响以及提高选题准确性等手段, 对MIC和a-STR进行改进, 引入了两类新的选题策略。计算机模拟实验显示, 新的选题方法效果比较理想
Computerized adaptive testing · Psychometrics · Reliability engineering · Statistics · Computer Science · Engineering · Mathematics · Psychology · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Risk and Safety Analysis · Technology and Data Analysis · Artificial Intelligence
A-Stratified Methods Combining Item Exposure Control and General Test Overlap in Computerized Adaptive Testing
A Comparison of Item Selection Methods for Controlling Exposure Rate in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing
Item Selection Strategies Based on Attribute Mastery Probabilities in CD-CAT
Dynamic and Comprehensive Item Selection Strategies for Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Graded Response Model
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,31 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2015 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |