Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Zur Komposition von insofern als im Deutschen

Bibliographic Data

ID19415453
AuthorsSebastian Bücking (0000-0001-6927-725X, Universität Tübingen , Sonderforschungsbereich 833 „Bedeutungskonstitution“ Tübingen , Germany, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume37
Issue1
Pages1-53
Publication date2018-06-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueZeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0721-9067 • E-ISSN: 1613-3706
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/zfs-2018-0001
OpenAlexW2807050298
LanguageDE
References cited7

This paper is about the compositional interpretation of adverbial clauses as introduced by insofern als (lit. ‘insofar as’) in German (= IAs); for example, Die Lösung ist insofern attraktiv, als sie günstig ist . (lit. ‘The solution is insofar attractive as it is cheap.’). I argue that IAs always contribute dimensional restrictions, but do so in two distinct structure-sensitive ways: IAs can be structurally integrated into their host clauses and, thus, dimensionally specify a lexical component of the matrix VP (= LIAs) (‘The solution is attractive in price.’); alternatively, they can be structurally non-integrated and, thus, provide a dimension against which the matrix sentence is evaluated holistically (= SIAs) (‘In light of the fact that the solution is cheap, one may say that it is attrac­tive.’). The proposal is supported by both syntactic and semantic-pragmatic evidence: (i) LIAs and SIAs are distinguished by independently motivated tests for structural (non)integration such as scope of negation and particles, focus-background structure, and variable binding. (ii) LIAs are sensitive to a lexically given multidimensional matrix predication. SIAs, by contrast, require that the embedded clause specify an objective justification for the truth of the matrix proposition as a whole. In particular, IAs are shown to not pass tests for subjectivity as discussed for finden (‘find’); for example, judge- dependency, resistance against denial, or, accessibility of a subjective attitude. The paper concludes by sketching a formal derivation of both readings. Accordingly, LIAs constrain the dimensional parameter of multidimensional lexical predications, while SIAs provide facts that de re justify the assertibility of predications for topic situations

Adverbial · Linguistics · Pure mathematics · Sentence · Computer Science · Linguistic research and analysis · linguistics and terminology studies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Contrast and movement to the German prefield

    Werner Frey•Architecture of Focus•2006

  • Handbuch der deutschen Konnektoren 2

    Eva Breindl, Anna Volodina et al.•Handbuch der deutschen…•2014

  • A Typology of Multidimensional Adjectives

    Galit W Sassoon•Journal of Semantics•2013

  • The Construction of Properties Under Perspectives

    Renate Bartsch•Journal of Semantics•1986

  • On the limits of the Davidsonian approach

    Claudia Maienborn•Theoretical Linguistics•2005

  • Composing wie wenn—the semantics of hypothetical comparison clauses in German

    Open Access•Sebastian Bücking•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2017

  • Similarity demonstratives

    Open Access•Carla Umbach, Helmar Gust•Lingua•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae