Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Attitudes of Family Physicians in Washington State Toward Physician‐Assisted Suicide

Bibliographic Data

ID19432004
AuthorsL Gary Hart (University of Washington, corresponding author), Thomas E Norris (University of Washington), Denise M Lishner (University of Washington)
Year2003
Volume19
Issue4
Pages461-469
Publication date2003-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Rural Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0890-765X • E-ISSN: 1748-0361
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1748-0361.2003.tb00583.x
PMID14526504
OpenAlexW2013842717
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited29

Context: The topic of physician‐assisted suicide is difficult and controversial. With recent laws allowing physicians to assist in a terminally ill patient's suicide under certain circumstances, the debate concerning the appropriate and ethical role for physicians has intensified. Purpose: This paper utilizes data from a 1997 survey of family physicians (FPs) in Washington State to test two hypotheses: (1) older respondents will indicate greater opposition to physician‐assisted suicide than their younger colleagues, and (2) male and rural physicians will have more negative attitudes toward physician‐assisted suicide than their female and urban counterparts. Methods: A questionnaire administered to all active FPs obtained a 68% response rate, with 1074 respondents found to be eligible in this study. A ZIP code system based on generalist Health Service Areas was used to designate those practicing in rural versus urban areas. Findings: One‐fourth of the respondents overall indicated support for physician‐assisted suicide. When asked whether this practice should be legalized, 39% said yes, 44% said no, and 18% indicated that they did not know. Fifty‐eight percent of the study sample reported that they would not include physician‐assisted suicide in their practices even if it were legal. Responses disaggregated by age‐groups closely paralleled the group overall. There was a significant pattern of opposition on the part of rural male respondents compared to urban female respondents. Even among those reporting support for physician‐assisted suicide, many expressed reluctance about including it in their practices. Conclusions: These findings highlight the systematic differences in FP attitudes toward one aspect of health care by gender, rural‐urban practice location, and other factors

Assisted suicide · Family medicine · Medical emergency · Occupational safety and health · Physician assisted suicide · Poison control · Political science · Psychiatry · Suicide prevention · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Medicine · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

  • Modeling the Mental Health Workforce in Washington State

    Open Access•Laura‐Mae Baldwin, Miriam M Patanian et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2006

  • Attitudes of Family Physicians in Washington State Toward Physician‐Assisted Suicide

    Open Access•L Gary Hart, Thomas E Norris et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2003

  • Rural Definitions for Health Policy and Research

    L Gary Hart, Eric H Larson et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2005

  • Using the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile to Measure Physician Supply in Small Towns

    Open Access•Thomas R Konrad, REBECCA T SLIFKIN et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2000

  • Attitudes of Family Physicians in Washington State Toward Physician‐Assisted Suicide

    Open Access•L Gary Hart, Thomas E Norris et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2003

Citations per year0.13
Citation span2003 - 2006 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae