Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Opt-out HIV testing in prison

Informed and voluntary

Bibliographic Data

ID19443138
AuthorsDennis L Rosen (0000-0002-0493-8915, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, corresponding author), David L Rosen, Carol E Golin (0000-0002-5546-3163, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Catherine A Grodensky (0000-0001-9389-3423, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Jeanine May (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), J Michael Bowling (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Robert F Devellis (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Becky L White (0000-0002-0643-7890, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), David A Wohl (0000-0002-7764-0212, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Year2015
Volume27
Issue5
Pages545-554
Publication date2015-05-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAIDS Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0954-0121 • E-ISSN: 1360-0451
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09540121.2014.989486
PMID25506799
PMCIDPMC4336588
OpenAlexW1980174636
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited23

HIV testing in prison settings has been identified as an important mechanism to detect cases among high-risk, underserved populations. Several public health organizations recommend that testing across health-care settings, including prisons, be delivered in an opt-out manner. However, implementation of opt-out testing within prisons may pose challenges in delivering testing that is informed and understood to be voluntary. In a large state prison system with a policy of voluntary opt-out HIV testing, we randomly sampled adult prisoners in each of seven intake prisons within two weeks after their opportunity to be HIV tested. We surveyed prisoners' perception of HIV testing as voluntary or mandatory and used multivariable statistical models to identify factors associated with their perception. We also linked survey responses to lab records to determine if prisoners' test status (tested or not) matched their desired and perceived test status. Thirty-eight percent (359/936) perceived testing as voluntary. The perception that testing was mandatory was positively associated with age less than 25 years (adjusted relative risk [aRR]: 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24, 1.71) and preference that testing be mandatory (aRR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.41, 2.31) but negatively associated with entry into one of the intake prisons (aRR: 0.41 95% CI: 0.27, 0.63). Eighty-nine percent of prisoners wanted to be tested, 85% were tested according to their wishes, and 82% correctly understood whether or not they were tested. Most prisoners wanted to be HIV tested and were aware that they had been tested, but less than 40% understood testing to be voluntary. Prisoners' understanding of the voluntary nature of testing varied by intake prison and by a few individual-level factors. Testing procedures should ensure that opt-out testing is informed and understood to be voluntary by prisoners and other vulnerable populations

Confidence interval · Family medicine · Opt-out · Perception · Prison · Public health · Relative risk · Risk perception · Turnover · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

  • Hepatitis C virus infection in EU/EEA and United Kingdom prisons

    Open Access•Aya Olivia Nakitanda, Linda Montanari et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Opt-Out HIV Testing of Inmates in North Carolina Prisons

    Open Access•Catherine A Grodensky, Dennis L Rosen et al.•AIDS and Behavior•2015

  • Great Expectations

    Open Access•Carol E Golin, Brian G Barkley et al.•AIDS and Behavior•2017

  • Underutilization of HIV Testing Among Men with Incarceration Histories

    Open Access•Claire E Farel, Carol E Golin et al.•AIDS and Behavior•2019

  • HIV and HCV prevalence and incarceration-related risks among injecting drug users in three West Bank governorates

    Aleksandar Štulhofer, Isam Jwehan et al.•AIDS Care•2016

  • Reimbursing incarcerated individuals for participation in research

    Open Access•Andrea Mambro, Avideh Afshar et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2024

  • Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief HIV Knowledge Questionnaire

    Michael P Carey, Kerstin E E Schröder•AIDS Education•2002

  • Estimated HIV Incidence in the United States, 2006–2009

    Open Access•Joseph Prejean, Ruiguang Song et al.•PLoS ONE•2011

  • Participation Rates in Epidemiologic Studies

    Open Access•Sandro Galea, Melissa Tracy•Annals of Epidemiology•2007

  • HIV and Aids surveillance among inmates in Maryland prisons

    Edward N Kassira•Journal of Urban Health•2001

  • Is 'Opt-Out HIV Testing' a real option among pregnant women in rural districts in Kenya

    Open Access•Opondo Awiti Ujiji, Birgitta Rubenson et al.•BMC Public Health•2011

  • Efficacy of an Emergency Department-Based HIV Screening Program in the Deep South

    Open Access•Matthew Wheatley, Matthew A Wheatley et al.•Journal of Urban Health•2011

  • HIV testing in prisoners

    Jon Kim Andrus, David W Fleming et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1989

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0.55
Citation span2015 - 2024 (10)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae