PPA or Oecm? Differentiating between privately protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures on private land
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19445924 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brent A Mitchell (0000-0001-5305-1029, Quebec Labrador Foundation, corresponding author), James Fitzsimons (0000-0003-4277-8040, Deakin University), James A Fitzsimons, Candice M D Stevens, Dale R Wright (0000-0003-3946-3582) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | SI |
| Pages | 49-60 |
| Publication date | 2018-07-23 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PARKS (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0960-233X • E-ISSN: 2411-2119 |
| Publisher | IUCN (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2305/iucn.ch.2018.parks-24-sibam.en |
| OpenAlex | W2883008138 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 3 |
Private land conservation has an increasingly important role in ensuring global conservation networks are comprehensive, adequate and representative. To contribute to the Convention on Biological Diversity's Aichi Target 11, areas on private land must be either privately protected areas (PPAs) or 'other effective area-based conservation measures' (OECMs) on private land. Here we compare PPAs to OECMs on private land, clarify misconceptions and provide case studies for how two jurisdictions, Australia and South Africa, have worked through applying these categories to local private land conservation mechanisms
Business · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Environmental Conservation and Management · Environmental Science
Convergences and divergences between scientific and Indigenous and Local Knowledge contribute to inform carnivore conservation
Increasing transparency and accountability in global protected and conserved area reporting
Biocultural heritage of transhumant territories
Assessing the extent and contribution of Oecms in South Africa
Exploring landowners' perceptions, motivations and needs for voluntary conservation in a cultural landscape
Assessing landowners’ preferences to inform voluntary private land conservation
Small habitat matrix
Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data
| Citations per year | 1.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |