Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Short Communication

Governance type bias in global ranger survey: Implications for relevance and analogous future works

Bibliographic Data

ID19446102
AuthorsBen Parker (0000-0001-7959-6529), Michael Peter Hoffmann (0000-0001-5003-5138, Zoological Society of London), Michael Hoffmann (0000-0003-4785-2254), Rohit Singh (0000-0002-8415-6728), Rohit Kumar Singh (0000-0001-9909-4489, corresponding author), Drew McVey, Lucía Ruiz
Year2022
Issue28.1
Pages71-76
Publication date2022-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePARKS (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0960-233X • E-ISSN: 2411-2119
PublisherIUCN (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2305/ucn.ch.2022.parks-21-1bp.en
OpenAlexW4320075596
LanguageEN
References cited5

A growing body of literature explores rangers' perceptions and experiences of implementing conservation activities. In particular, the Global Ranger Perception Survey, carried out by the WWF, is the largest global assessment of ranger perceptions and experiences of working conditions in protected and conserved areas, providing insights into various aspects of the profession of rangers. Nevertheless, when the ranger perception survey data was associated with site governance type, we found that the survey is dominated by protected and conserved areas governed by government agencies (81 per cent) while sites with Indigenous and community governance were poorly represented (10 per cent) despite the vast area under this form of governance globally. These biases in governance mean that the survey data will be less relevant to protected and conserved areas with less government involvement, such as privately protected areas and those governed by Indigenous peoples and local communities. Our study therefore indicates that future large-scale surveys of ranger perceptions and experiences would benefit from including a more diverse set of sites with regards to governance types. Further, there could be value in carrying out a new survey akin to the Global Ranger Perception Survey with a focus on protected and conserved areas governed by Indigenous peoples and local communities

Corporate governance · Economics · Management · Political science · Sociology · Survey research · Applied Psychology · Law · Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Local Residents Perception of Benefits and Losses From Protected Areas in India and Nepal

    Open Access•Krithi K Karanth, Sanjay K Nepal•Environmental Management•2012

  • Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on rangers and the role of rangers as a planetary health service

    Open Access•Rohit Singh, Chris Galliers et al.•PARKS•2021

  • A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation

    Open Access•Stephen T Garnett, Neil D Burge et al.•Nature Sustainability•2018

  • Anything We Do, We Have to Include the Communities’

    William D Moreto, Rod K Brunson et al.•The British Journal of Criminology•2017

  • We Fight against Wrong Doers

    William D Moreto, Matthew C Matusiak•Deviant Behavior•2017

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae