Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Validity of anthropometric techniques for estimating percentage body fat in obese females before and after sizable weight loss

Bibliographic Data

ID19458863
AuthorsRichard L Seip (University of Virginia), David Snead (0000-0002-0766-9650, University of Virginia), Arthur Weltman (0000-0002-0125-3769, University of Virginia, corresponding author)
Year1993
Volume5
Issue5
Pages549-557
Publication date1993-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Human Biology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1042-0533 • E-ISSN: 1520-6300
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ajhb.1310050506
PMID28548381
OpenAlexW2080050810
LanguageEN
References cited25

The validity of selected generalized (n = 7) and obese population‐specific (n = 2) skinfold and girth based anthropometric equations (using hydrostatic weighing as the criterion measure) was evaluated in 19 obese women before and after a mean body weight loss of 19.4 kg (percent body fat was reduced from 45.3% to 35.4%). For the present study, evaluation criteria of mean differences in percent body fat (%BF) of 0.70, and total error (T.E.) values of 0.70 and T.E. values of less than 5% in obese women before weight loss. After 19.4 kg of weight loss, all but three of the equations resulted in mean differences in %BF of less than 3%, r values of > 0.70 and T.E. values of less than 5%. The obese population‐specific equations of Barrows and Snook (1987) and Weltman et al. (1988) were not accurate predictors of body composition after weight loss as they resulted in mean differences of 4.5–7.0 %BF. Although some of the equations examined were valid predictors of %BF either before or after weight loss, only the Jackson et al. (1980) equations which utilized both skinfolds and hip girth, and the Tran and Weltman (1988) equation which utilized trunk girths, resulted in mean differences of r = 0.70, and T.E. scores of

Animal science · Anthropometry · Biology · Body weight · Classification of obesity · Fat mass · Hydrostatic weighing · Obesity · Population · Skinfold thickness · Weight loss · Body Composition Measurement Techniques · Mathematics · Medicine · Occupational Health and Performance · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Endocrinology · Internal Medicine

  • Generalized equations for predicting body density of men

    Open Access•Andrew S Jackson, M L Pollock•British Journal of Nutrition•1978

  • Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness

    Open Access•J V G A Durnin, J Womersley•British Journal of Nutrition•1974

  • Densitometric Analysis of Body Composition

    Open Access•Josef Brozek, FRANCISCO GRANDE et al.•Annals of the New York Academy of…•1963

  • Validity of skinfold and girth based regression equations for the prediction of body composition in obese adults

    Open Access•Richard L Seip, Arthur Weltman•American Journal of Human Biology•1991

  • Validity of anthropometric regression equations for predicting changes in body fat of obese females

    Open Access•Douglas L Ballor, Victor L Katch•American Journal of Human Biology•1989

  • Relative reliability of circumferences and skinfolds as measures of body fat distribution

    Open Access•William H Mueller, Robert M Malina•American Journal of Physical…•1987

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae