Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Environmental and economic impacts of solar‐powered integrated greenhouses

Bibliographic Data

ID19467752
AuthorsJoseph Hollingsworth (0000-0003-3958-5678, Department of Civil Construction, and Environmental Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina, corresponding author), Eshwar Ravishankar (0000-0001-8684-4113, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina), Brendan O'Connor (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina), Brendan O’Connor (0000-0002-8999-5184, North Carolina State University), Jeremiah X Johnson (0000-0002-9602-4976, Department of Civil Construction, and Environmental Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina), Joseph F DeCarolis (0000-0003-4677-4522, Department of Civil Construction, and Environmental Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina)
Year2020
Volume24
Issue1
Pages234-247
Publication date2020-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/jiec.12934
OpenAlexW2947564267
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited31

Greenhouse vegetable production plays a vital role in providing year‐round fresh vegetables to global markets, achieving higher yields, and using less water than open‐field systems, but at the expense of increased energy demand. This study examines the life cycle environmental and economic impacts of integrating semitransparent organic photovoltaics (OPVs) into greenhouse designs. We employ life cycle assessment to analyze six environmental impacts associated with producing greenhouse‐grown tomatoes in a Solar PoweRed INtegrated Greenhouse (SPRING) compared to conventional greenhouses with and without an adjacent solar photovoltaic array, across three distinct locations. The SPRING design produces significant reductions in environmental impacts, particularly in regions with high solar insolation and electricity‐intensive energy demands. For example, in Arizona, global warming potential values for a conventional, adjacent PV and SPRING greenhouse are found to be 3.71, 2.38, and 2.36 kg CO 2 eq/kg tomato, respectively. Compared to a conventional greenhouse, the SPRING design may increase life cycle environmental burdens in colder regions because the shading effect of OPV increases heating demands. Our analysis shows that SPRING designs must maintain crop yields at levels similar to conventional greenhouses in order to be economically competitive. Assuming consistent crop yields, uncertainty analysis shows average net present cost of production across Arizona to be $3.43, $3.38, and $3.64 per kg of tomato for the conventional, adjacent PV and SPRING system, respectively

Agricultural engineering · Agronomy · Economics · Electricity · Greenhouse · Greenhouse gas · Life-cycle assessment · Photovoltaic system · Photovoltaics · Shading · Solar energy · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Science · Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability · solar cell performance optimization · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · Ecology · Environmental Engineering

  • Why energy models should integrate social and environmental factors

    Open Access•Diana Süsser, Nick Martin et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • The global impact of financial development on renewable energy in a panel structural vector autoregression analysis

    Open Access•Xinxin Wang, Zeshui Xu et al.•Sustainable Development•2022

  • Bringing a life cycle perspective to emerging technology development

    Open Access•Joule Bergerson, Stefano Cucurachi et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2020

  • Comparison of Land, Water, and Energy Requirements of Lettuce Grown Using Hydroponic vs. Conventional Agricultural Methods

    Open Access•Guilherme Oliveira Barbosa, Guilherme Barbosa et al.•International Journal of…•2015

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2020 - 2022 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae