Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Worse is worse and better doesn't matter

The effects of favorable and unfavorable environmental information on consumers’ willingness to pay

Bibliographic Data

ID19468699
AuthorsLars Petersen (0000-0003-1062-7846, Faculty of Business Management Alanus University of Arts and Social Sciences Alfter Germany, corresponding author), Jacob Hörisch (0000-0001-5825-1652, Centre for Sustainability Management Leuphana University of Lüneburg Lüneburg Germany), Kathleen Jacobs (0000-0001-8837-6632, Institute for Food and Resource Economics University of Bonn Bonn Germany)
Year2021
Volume25
Issue5
Pages1338-1356
Publication date2021-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/jiec.13141
OpenAlexW3169058082
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited63

Increasing consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for environmentally friendly products is a key challenge for sustainable development in market economies. Still, how consumers react to favorable and unfavorable environmental information of different quantitative extents is largely unknown. This research therefore uses prospect theory and competing theoretical foundations to derive pertinent hypotheses and test them by using a multi‐level structural equation model. The analysis draws on a survey‐based experiment conducted among a representative sample of the German population. Results confirm key assertions of prospect theory. The negative effect caused by unfavorable product carbon footprint information on WTP is stronger than the positive effect caused by respective favorable information. Besides this negativity bias, consumers tend to generally reward or punish deviations of a product's environmental performance from industry average instead of consistently accounting for the size of these deviations. From a sustainable development perspective, the observed patterns highlight a problematic contrast between the need for substantial environmental improvements and limited market incentives for companies. Consequently, political intervention is needed to introduce negative labeling, raise consumers’ reference points, set minimum industry standards, and subsidize companies for radical improvements

Business · Carbon Footprint · Economics · Greenhouse gas · Incentive · Microeconomics · Public economics · Willingness to pay · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Marketing

  • Indonesian consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for sustainability-certified coffee

    Open Access•Mahmud Rifai, Julia Checco et al.•Cleaner and Responsible Consumption•2026

  • The influence of a hypothetical eco-score on purchase decisions

    Open Access•Kathleen Jacobs, Jens Bergener et al.•Cleaner and Responsible Consumption•2025

  • The impact of biodiversity information on willingness to pay

    Open Access•Jacob Hörisch, Lars Petersen et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2024

  • An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Techniques

    Ronald H Heck, Ronald Heck et al.•Introduction to Multilevel…•2015

  • Do Satisfied Customers Really Pay More? A Study of the Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay

    Open Access•Christian Homburg, Nicole Koschate et al.•Journal of Marketing•2005

  • Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty

    Graham Loomes, Robert Sugden•The Review of Economic Studies•1986

  • Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero

    Open Access•Stephen A Spiller, Gavan J Fitzsimons et al.•Journal of Marketing Research•2013

  • Multilevel structural equation models for assessing moderation within and across levels of analysis.

    Kristopher J Preacher, Zhen Zhang et al.•Psychological Methods•2016

  • Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions

    Open Access•Pat Auger, Timothy M Devinney•Journal of Business Ethics•2007

  • Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility

    Open Access•Sankar Sen, C B Bhattacharya et al.•Journal of Marketing Research•2001

  • Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food

    Open Access•Katrin Zander, Ulrich Hamm•Food Quality and Preference•2010

  • Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1991

  • Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic

    Open Access•Albert Satorra, Peter M Bentler•Psychometrika•2010

  • Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion

    Open Access•Paul Rozin, Edward B Royzman•Personality and Social Psychology…•2001

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Prospect Theory

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Econometrica•1979

  • Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2012

  • Planetary boundaries

    Open Access•Will Steffen, Katherine Richardson et al.•Science•2015

  • A safe operating space for humanity

    Open Access•Johan Rockström, Will Steffen et al.•Nature•2009

  • A Scaled Difference Chi-Square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis

    Open Access•Albert Satorra, Peter M Bentler•Psychometrika•2001

  • Global warming’s five Germanys

    Open Access•Julia Metag, Tobias Füchslin et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • An Outlook into a Possible Future of Footprint Research

    Open Access•Manfred Lenzen•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2014

  • Willingness to Pay for Eco‐Certified Refurbished Products

    Open Access•Rainer Harms, Jonathan D Linton•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2016

  • The Impact of Sustainability Information on Consumer Decision Making

    Open Access•Dara O’rourke, Dara O'Rourke et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2016

  • Moving Forward on Product Carbon Footprint Standards

    Open Access•Laura Draucker, scott kaufman et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2011

  • Corporate and Product Carbon Footprint under Compound Hybrid Analysis

    Open Access•Sergio Alvarez, Maria‐Angeles Tobarra et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2019

  • Determinants of demand for green products

    Open Access•Dorothée Brécard, Boubaker Hlaimi et al.•Ecological Economics•2009

  • Sustainability labels on coffee

    Open Access•Ellen J Van Loo, Vincenzina Caputo et al.•Ecological Economics•2015

  • Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation

    John J Skowronski, Donal E Carlston•Psychological Bulletin•1989

  • Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience

    Open Access•Maria L Loureiro, Justus Lotade•Ecological Economics•2005

  • Beyond pleasure and pain

    E Tory Higgins•American Psychologist•1997

  • "The Market for "Lemons

    George A Akerlof•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1970

  • Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems

    E Tory Higgins, Christopher J R Roney et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1994

  • Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling

    Open Access•Nassim Tabri, Craig M Elliott•Canadian Graduate Journal of…•2012

  • Anomalies

    Open Access•Daniel Kahneman, Jack L Knetsch et al.•The Journal of Economic…•1991

Citations per year1.5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae