Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Prospective life cycle assessment of sodium‐ion batteries made from abundant elements

Bibliographic Data

ID19469008
AuthorsSanna Wickerts (0000-0002-7833-0849, Environmental Systems Analysis Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden), Rickard Arvidsson (0000-0002-9258-0641, Environmental Systems Analysis Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden, corresponding author), Anders Nordelöf (0000-0002-7455-7341, Environmental Systems Analysis Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden), Magdalena Svanström (0000-0001-8468-1293, Environmental Systems Analysis Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden), Patrik Johansson (0000-0002-3161-8765, Materials Physics Department of Physics Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden)
Year2024
Volume28
Issue1
Pages116-129
Publication date2024-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/jiec.13452
OpenAlexW4388671496
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited61

Batteries are enablers for reducing fossil‐fuel dependency and climate‐change impacts. In this study, a prospective life cycle assessment (LCA) of large‐scale production of two different sodium‐ion battery (SIB) cells is performed with a cradle‐to‐gate system boundary. The SIB cells modeled have Prussian white cathodes and hard carbon anodes based only on abundant elements and thus constitute potentially preferable options to current lithium‐ion battery (LIB) cells from a mineral resource scarcity point of view. The functional unit was 1 kWh theoretical electricity storage capacity, and the specific energy density of the cells was 160 Wh/kg. Data for the cathode active material come from a large‐scale facility under construction and data for the SIB cell production is based on a large‐scale LIB cell gigafactory. For other SIB cell materials, prospective inventory data was obtained from a generic eight‐step procedure developed, which can be used by other LCA practitioners. The results show that both SIB cells indeed have considerably lower mineral resource scarcity impacts than nickel‐manganese‐cobalt (NMC)‐type LIB cells in a cradle‐to‐gate perspective, while their global warming impacts are on par. Main recommendations to SIB manufacturers are to source fossil‐free electricity for cell production and use hard carbon anodes based on lignin instead of phenolic resin. Additionally, since none of the assessed electrolytes had clearly lower cradle‐to‐gate impacts than any other, more research into SIB electrolyte materials with low environmental and resource impacts should be prioritized. An improvement of the SIB cell production model would be to obtain large‐scale production data specific to SIB cells

Anode · Electrical engineering · Electricity · Electrode · Life-cycle assessment · Waste management · Advanced battery technologies research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Chemistry · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Science · Extraction and Separation Processes · Materials Science

  • Prospective life cycle assessment of future Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing deposition process for large-scale steel parts

    Open Access•Christian Spreafico, Samruddha Kokare et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2026

  • What is an emerging technology?

    Open Access•Daniele Rotolo, Diana Hicks et al.•Research Policy•2015

  • Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment

    Open Access•Göran Finnveden, Michael Zwicky Hauschild et al.•Journal of Environmental Management•2009

  • Understanding the future of lithium

    Open Access•Hanjiro Ambrose, Alissa Kendall•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2020

  • A systematic approach to assess the environmental impact of emerging technologies

    Open Access•Mitchell K van der Hulst, Mark A J Huijbregts et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2020

  • Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies

    Open Access•Rickard Arvidsson, Anne‐Marie Tillman et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2018

  • Surplus Ore Potential as a Scarcity Indicator for Resource Extraction

    Open Access•Marisa D M Vieira, Marisa Vieira et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2017

  • Life Cycle Assessment of a Lithium‐Ion Battery Vehicle Pack

    Open Access•Linda Ager‐Wick Ellingsen, Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2014

  • Comparative life cycle assessment of Fe2O3-based fibers as anode materials for sodium-ion batteries

    Open Access•Angela Malara, Fabiola Pantò et al.•Environment Development and…•2021

  • Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time

    Open Access•Florian Knobloch, Steef V Hanssen et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • The precarious political economy of cobalt

    Open Access•B K Sovacool•The Extractive Industries and…•2019

  • Scenario types and techniques

    Open Access•Lena Börjeson, Mattias Höjer et al.•Futures•2006

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae