On Richard Carrier’s Doubts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19477971 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel N Gullotta (USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 310-346 |
| Publication date | 2017-12-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1476-8690 • E-ISSN: 1745-5197 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/17455197-01502009 |
| OpenAlex | W2773539134 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
The Jesus Myth theory is the view that the person known as Jesus of Nazareth had no historical existence. Throughout the centuries this view has had a few but notable adherents such as Bruno Bauer, Arthur Drews, G.A. Wells, and Robert M. Price. Recently, Richard Carrier’s work On the Historicity of Jesus (Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2014) has attempted to reexamine the question in a rigorous academic fashion. According to Carrier, within the earliest days of Christianity, Jesus was not understood as a historic-human figure, but rather as a celestial-angelic being, akin to Gabriel in Islam or to Moroni in Mormonism, and only came to be understood as a historical person later. While Carrier’s hypothesis is problematic and unpersuasive, there are several key points related to his work that this article specifically challenges and critiques
Biblical studies · Gnosticism · Historical Jesus · Islam · Mythology · Theology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Law · Mormonism, Religion, and History · Philosophy · Religious studies
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.43 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |