Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

“Courts are not … therapeutic agencies”

What role for therapeutic jurisprudence in Australian family law parenting disputes involving family violence

Bibliographic Data

ID19478472
AuthorsGeorgina Dimopoulos (0000-0001-8838-0746, Southern Cross University, corresponding author), Eliza Hew (0009-0006-9877-2376, Southern Cross University)
Year2026
Volume64
Issue1
Pages83-99
Publication date2026-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFamily Court Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1531-2445 • E-ISSN: 1744-1617
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/fcre.70040
OpenAlexW7124165804
LanguageEN
References cited27

This article examines the role of therapeutic jurisprudence in Australian post‐separation parenting disputes involving family violence. A recent appellate court decision has asserted that “courts are not, and cannot operate like, therapeutic agencies”. We engage with the therapeutic origins of the Family Court of Australia, the family courts' role in the “web of accountability” for family violence, the potential for judicial officers to motivate behavioral change in litigants, and therapeutic approaches to family law in various jurisdictions, to suggest how Australia's family courts may embrace therapeutic jurisprudence to promote the accountability of people who use violence, and the safety of those who experience it

Accountability · Child custody · Family court · Family law · Jurisprudence · Therapeutic jurisprudence · Therapeutic relationship · Alexander von Humboldt Studies · Child Abuse and Trauma · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

  • Batterer Intervention Systems

    Edward Gondolf, Edward W Gondolf•Batterer Intervention Systems•2002

  • Family Law and Therapeutic Jurisprudence

    Open Access•Barbara A Babb•Family Court Review•2021

  • Reform within the Family Courts

    Open Access•Connie Healy•Family Court Review•2021

  • Singapore Family Justice Courts Workplan 2020

    Open Access•Debbie Ong•Family Court Review•2021

  • Engaging fathers who commit family violence

    Open Access•Robert Nonomura, Dan Zamfir et al.•Family Court Review•2024

  • Therapeutic Justice ‐ What It Means for the Family Justice System in Singapore

    Open Access•Yarni Loi, Suzanne Chin•Family Court Review•2021

  • From Helping Court to Community‐Based Services

    Open Access•Lawrie Moloney•Family Court Review•2013

  • Legal systems abuse and coercive control

    Open Access•Heather Douglas•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2017

  • Still blaming the victim of intimate partner violence? Women’s narratives of victim desistance and redemption when seeking support

    Open Access•Salome Meyer•Theoretical Criminology•2015

  • Secondary Victimization

    Open Access•Lesley Laing•Violence Against Women•2016

  • Strengthening the Web of Accountability

    Open Access•Pauline Spencer•Alternative Law Journal•2016

  • Against the Grain

    Open Access•Vicki Lens•Law & Social Inquiry•2015

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae