From emergency relief to system strengthening
Stakeholder perspectives on official development assistance for reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health in Guinea-Bissau
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19480190 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anaxore Casimiro (0000-0002-5351-6815, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, corresponding author), Réka Maulide Cane (0000-0001-8209-4976, Instituto de Medicina Tropical), Michel Jareski Andrade (0009-0005-7919-098X, Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste), Luís Varandas (0000-0002-8419-6033, Instituto de Medicina Tropical), Isabel Craveiro (0000-0003-4348-1986, Instituto de Medicina Tropical) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 2672821-2672821 |
| Publication date | 2026-12-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-1692 • E-ISSN: 1744-1706 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17441692.2026.2672821 |
| PMID | 42116235 |
| OpenAlex | W7160922345 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
Guinea-Bissau, a politically fragile West African nation, relies heavily on official development assistance (ODA) to sustain reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health (RMNCH) services. This study explored how national and international stakeholders perceive the role, evolution and effectiveness of RMNCH-related ODA and how these perspectives compare with donor strategies. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 key informants and applied an AI-assisted, systematically validated framework to analyse 50 donor documents, integrating findings through comparative coding and convergence-divergence synthesis. Stakeholders viewed ODA as 'humanitarian' or 'emergency' aid, substituting for the state rather than catalysing durable system change. Donor documents strongly emphasised coordination, alignment and ownership but tended to underplay political risk and institutional capacity limits. Triangulated analysis identified interlinked constraints: political instability and ministerial turnover, fragmented coordination despite multiple formal mechanisms, performative alignment with national plans, limited domestic financial contribution and an evolution toward vertical funding that risks further fragmentation. Findings point to the need for hybrid coordination arrangements combining national and international leadership, depoliticised and stable technical capacity within the Ministry of Public Health, longer and more flexible programme cycles with contingency mechanisms, and greater domestic financing and use of national strategic plans as a genuine framework for system strengthening
Child protection · Christian ministry · Development aid · Emergency management · Poison control · Politics · Public health · Stakeholder · Vulnerability (computing) · Global Maternal and Child Health · Human Rights and Development · International Development and Aid
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
The humanitarian-development nexus
Understanding the political economy of reforming global health initiatives – insights from global and country levels
Diplomacia da saúde e cooperação Sul-Sul
Official Development Assistance and Private Voluntary Support for Reproductive, Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health in Guinea-Bissau
Health in the service of state-building in fragile and conflict affected contexts
Association between Development Assistance for Health and Disease Burden
The effects of global health initiatives on country health systems
Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method
Foreign Aid and National Ownership in Mali and Ghana
How do external donors influence national health policy processes? Experiences of domestic policy actors in Cambodia and Pakistan
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Where Does the Money Go? Best and Worst Practices in Foreign Aid
Foreign Aid, Institutions, and Governance in Sub-Saharan Africa
Thematic Analysis
| Highly cited | No |
|---|