Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Safeguarding engagement with under-represented groups

Ethical considerations for mitigating fraudulent participation in health research

Bibliographic Data

ID19480228
AuthorsJenny Duong (0009-0006-3333-9045, University of Calgary), Iqra Rahamatullah (University of Calgary), Tristan Bilash (0009-0007-3798-2254, University of Calgary), Caitlin Forbes (University of Calgary), Sharon Hou (0000-0001-5828-6820, Simon Fraser University), Sharon H J Hou, Brianna Henry (0000-0002-6872-7615, University of Calgary), Sheila N Garland (0000-0002-6119-318X, Memorial University of Newfoundland), Jacqueline L Bender (0000-0003-1501-335X, University of Toronto), Perri R Tutelman (0000-0001-6013-7402, University of Calgary), Fiona Schulte (0000-0002-3076-9676), Fiona S M Schulte (University of Calgary, corresponding author)
Year2026
Publication date2026-05-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueResearch Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-0161 • E-ISSN: 2047-6094
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/17470161261434262
OpenAlexW7162202164
LanguageEN
References cited40

Members of under-represented, marginalized groups experience disparate health outcomes, warranting research that improves equitable engagement in research and subsequent care practices. However, in our online study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we encountered systematic signs of fraudulent behavior corroborated by recent reports from other research teams, with differing approaches to mitigating fraudulent participation. We highlight our experiences during recruitment and pilot focus groups, along with our actions for mitigating further recruitment of fraudulent participants. Then, we synthesize our learnings with other scholars’ experiences to provide recommendations for the study development, recruitment, screening, and data collection stages of research. We also offer a critical analysis of current recommendations and their implications for reinforcing barriers to engaging under-represented groups in research. The recommendations provided emphasize the importance of preventing fraudulent participation in quantitative and qualitative research through adopting multiple strategies, while balancing considerations for meaningfully engagement with under-represented groups to ensure equitable and inclusive research

Data collection · Focus group · Health care · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Research ethics · Rules of engagement · Safeguarding · Ethics in Clinical Research · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Social Media in Health Education

  • Intergroup relations and health disparities

    Brenda Major, Wendy Berry Mendes et al.•Health Psychology•2013

  • Threats of Bots and Other Bad Actors to Data Quality Following Research Participant Recruitment Through Social Media

    Open Access•Rachel Pozzar, Marilyn J Hammer et al.•Journal of Medical Internet…•2020

  • The Use of Social Media in Recruitment for Medical Research Studies

    Open Access•Jane Topolovec-Vranic, Karthik Natarajan•Journal of Medical Internet…•2016

  • Detecting, Preventing, and Responding to “Fraudsters” in Internet Research

    Open Access•Jennifer E F Teitcher, Jennifer Teitcher et al.•Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics•2015

  • Pragmatic and ethical challenges in navigating inauthentic participation in remote qualitative research

    Open Access•Katelin Hoskins, Kelly Sebetka et al.•Research Ethics•2025

  • Lie for a Dime

    Open Access•Joan Chandler, Jesse J Chandler et al.•Social Psychological and…•2017

  • The Impact of Covid-19 on Global Inequality and Poverty

    Nishant Yonzan, Daniel Gerszon Mahler et al.•2022

  • ‘Imposter participants’ in online qualitative research, a new and increasing threat to data integrity

    Open Access•Damien Ridge, Laurna Bullock et al.•Health Expectations•2023

  • The Covid-19 Pandemics

    Open Access•Lara Maestripieri•Frontiers in Sociology•2021

  • Disrupted identities, invisibility and precarious support

    Open Access•Jane M Ussher, Kimberley Allison et al.•BMC Public Health•2023

  • Ask Me No Secrets, I'll Tell You No Lies

    Open Access•Sarah Flicker•Qualitative Report•2015

  • Confronting inequality in the “new normal”

    Open Access•Tim Jackson, Peter A Victor•Sustainable Development•2021

  • Persons With Disabilities as an Unrecognized Health Disparity Population

    Gloria L Krahn, Deborah Klein Walker et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2015

  • An Implausible Virtual Interview

    Open Access•Lisa Lucile Owens•Sociological Methodology•2022

  • Fraudulent Participation in Online Qualitative Studies

    Open Access•K Mistry, Sophie Merrick et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2024

  • Suspicious and fraudulent online survey participation

    Open Access•John Lawlor, Carl Thomas et al.•Methodological Innovations•2021

  • Beyond the challenge to research integrity

    K Drysdale, Nathanael Wells et al.•Health Sociology Review•2023

  • The Conscientious Responders Scale

    Open Access•Zdravko Marjanovic, C Ward Struthers et al.•SAGE Open•2014

  • Dealing With Scam in Online Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Annie Pullen Sansfaçon, Elio Gravel et al.•International Journal of…•2024

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae