Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The syntactic and semantic features of the “X zhōng de [中的] X” construction in modern Chinese and its motivations

Bibliographic Data

ID19487176
AuthorsXu Wen (0000-0003-3781-1125, Southwest University), Zichang Dong (0009-0009-0399-4737, Southwest University), Shuyan Yang (0000-0001-8086-5570, University High School)
Year2026
Volume13
Issue1
Pages1-37
Publication date2026-05-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Chinese Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2213-8706 • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/ijchl.00043.wen
OpenAlexW7162035195
LanguageEN
References cited19

This paper investigates the modern Chinese construction “X zhōng de X” ( 经典中的经典 , jīng diǎn zhōng de jīng diǎn , classic among classics). Drawing on corpus-based method, we retrieved and manually annotated attested instances from BCC and CCL corpora, identified 440 tokens, and analyzed them within the framework of Cognitive Construction Grammar. The analysis focuses on three aspects: (i) the conditions for words to enter the “X” slots in the construction, (ii) the syntactic and semantic features of the construction, (iii) its cognitive motivations. The results show that “X” is flexible in word class but displays a clear preference for disyllabic and semantically salient items. Syntactically, the construction functions mainly as a predicative expression, while semantically it conveys a scalar evaluative meaning equivalent to “highly/most X,” typically with a positive stance. Its productivity is explained by multiple cognitive motivations, including inheritance within a constructional network, analogical extension, communicative efficiency, and pragmatic vagueness. These findings refine the description of the “X zhōng de X” construction and contribute to usage-based accounts of Chinese constructional productivity

Ambiguity · Cognition · Predicative expression · Salient · Semantic feature · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Constructionalization and Constructional Changes

    Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Graeme Trousdale•Constructionalization And…•2013

  • Cognitive Grammar

    John R Taylor•Cognitive grammar•2002

  • Cognitive Grammar

    Ronald W Langacker, Ronald Langacker•Cognitive Grammar•2008

  • Syntactic Structures

    Noam Chomsky•Syntactic Structures•1957

  • Explain Me This

    Adele E Goldberg, Adele Ε Goldberg•Explain Me This•2019

  • The nature of generalization in language

    Open Access•Adele Ε Goldberg•Cognitive Linguistics•2009

  • Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things

    George Lakoff•Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things•1987

  • The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization

    Open Access•Elizabeth Closs Traugott•Cognitive Linguistics•2007

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae