Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

But, you see, the problem is … Perception verbs in courtroom talk

Focus on you see

Bibliographic Data

ID19498992
AuthorsMagdalena Szczyrbak (0000-0002-0182-0938, Jagiellonian University, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume20
Issue1
Pages24-40
Publication date2019-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTopics in Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1337-7590 • E-ISSN: 2199-6504
PublisherConstantine the Philosopher University in Nitra (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2478/topling-2019-0002
OpenAlexW2954097127
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited25

This article seeks to contribute to the body of research on the use of perception verbs in interaction and, more specifically, to enhance the understanding of how participants in courtroom proceedings exploit you see to manage the discourse as it unfolds and to negotiate stance. Against the background of earlier work on vision words in interaction, the study looks at parenthetical and non-parenthetical you see to reveal both perceptual and cognitive uses, and to identify their local pragmatic effect. As the analysis indicates, in the data at hand, lexical you see is more readily recruited than non-lexical you see , and it is found chiefly in grammatical and declarative questions. At the same time, it is the clause-initial you see that visibly brings out the epistemic tensions between the speakers and serves to contest the addressee’s position. The study corroborates the claim that you see is an argumentative marker, whose meaning (and force) depends on its formal properties (position, complementation) and the relationship between the speakers

Argumentative · Linguistics · Negotiation · Perception · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology

  • The pragmatic functions of 'respect' in lawyers' courtroom discourse

    Open Access•David Wright, Jeremy Robson et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2022

  • The Potentiality for Actuality Metonymy in English and Hungarian

    Klaus-Uwe Panther•Metonymy in Language and Thought•1999

  • The Comment Clause in English

    Open Access•Laurel J Brinton•Comment Clause in English•2008

  • The stance triangle

    John W Du Bois•Stancetaking in discourse•2007

  • A Comprehensive grammar of the English language

    Geoffrey N Leech, Jan Svartvik et al.•A Comprehensive grammar of the…•1985

  • Questions and epistemic stance

    Open Access•Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni et al.•Ampersand•2018

  • Interpreters’ treatment of discourse markers in courtroom questions

    Sandra Hale•International Journal of Speech…•1999

  • Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction

    Open Access•Lila San Roque, Kobin H Kendrick et al.•Cognitive Linguistics•2018

  • Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies

    Open Access•Lila San Roque, Kobin H Kendrick et al.•Cognitive Linguistics•2014

  • Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance

    Open Access•Susan Fitzmaurice•Discourse Studies•2004

  • Politeness

    Open Access•Penelope Brown, C Levinson et al.•Politeness•1987

  • Identity and interaction

    Open Access•Mary Bucholtz, Kira Hall•Discourse Studies•2005

  • Semantic constraints on relevance

    Open Access•Diane Blakemore•Lingua•1988

  • Well, that's why I asked the question sir

    Open Access•Bronwen Innes•Language in Society•2010

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae