Psychological type functions and biblical scholarship

An empirical enquiry among members of the Society of Biblical Literature

Bibliographic Data

ID19504152
AuthorsAndrew Village (0000-0002-2174-8822, York St John University, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume18
Issue7
Pages605-621
Publication date2015-08-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMental Health Religion & Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1367-4676 • E-ISSN: 1469-9737
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13674676.2014.961246
OpenAlexW2176997379
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited33

Psychological type theory would suggest that the two perceiving functions (sensing and intuition) and the two judging functions (thinking and feeling) shape the way that readers engage with biblical texts. Previous studies of churchgoers have demonstrated associations between psychological function preferences and preferences for interpretation. Building on this work, the current study examines whether biblical scholars engage with texts in ways that are predicted by their psychological function preferences. A sample of 338 members of the Society of Biblical Literature completed an online survey that measured their subject disciplines and methods of study, four psychological functions and four corresponding text-handling styles. Scholars who used “postmodern” methods such as reader response, ideological criticism or cultural studies were more likely to prefer intuition to sensing and feeling to thinking. There were significant correlations between text-handling styles and psychological type preferences, suggesting that psychological function has some influence on how biblical scholars perceive and evaluate texts

Cognitive science · Epistemology · Feeling · Ideology · Intuition · Linguistics · Scholarship · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Media, Religion, Digital Communication · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub