Trust and distrust in low‐income Michigan residents during the early Covid‐19 pandemic
A qualitative study
Bibliographic Data
BACKGROUND: Trust and distrust have shaped health behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the start of the pandemic, misinformation and polarization eroded trust across the United States. In states like Michigan, pandemic restrictions led to significant unrest. Michiganders also faced disproportionate morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 during this period. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this qualitative study was to understand the individual experiences of trust in low-income Michiganders during the early COVID-19 pandemic. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four participants at or below 200% of the federal poverty line who resided in Michigan were recruited for this study. APPROACH: Interviews were conducted during the winter of 2020 using a formal interview guide that addressed sources of information, perceptions of risk and exposure, protective behaviours and impacts of the pandemic at home, work and in receiving healthcare. RESULTS: Thematic analysis showed that themes of trust and distrust emerged in multiple facets of our participants' experiences, including in the context of information sources, the behaviours of others, health, financial security, employment and overall safety. Trust and distrust in low-income communities often stemmed from significant financial and economic vulnerabilities and instability in access to healthcare that was exacerbated in the pandemic. Furthermore, participant trust was shaped by internal (e.g., relationships with others) and external (e.g., source of information, social inequity) factors that influenced their perceptions and experiences during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Trust has played an important role in many aspects of the experiences of low-income communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is important for clinicians to consider as COVID-19 becomes endemic, and trust continues to impact patients' approaches to vaccines, testing and treatment options. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was designed and conducted with the assistance and input of the members of the DECIDERS Steering Committee, a diverse statewide network of community members in Michigan. The DECIDERS team allows community members to have a voice in the design and conduct of health research, and collaborates with researchers to improve health across the state of Michigan
Disease · Distrust · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Geography · Health care · Misinformation · Pandemic · Political science · Poverty · Public relations · Qualitative research · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · Thematic analysis · COVID-19 and Mental Health · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Medicine · Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
The Impact of Trust and Risk Perception on the Acceptance of Measures to Reduce Covid‐19 Cases
Media trust and infection mitigating behaviours during the Covid-19 pandemic in the USA
“I don't have much of a choice”
Trust and distrust in low‐income Michigan residents during the early Covid‐19 pandemic
Social and psychological consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic in African-American communities
Appraising and Handling Covid-19 Information
Social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic
Perceptions of adult Arkansans regarding trusted sources of information about the Covid-19 pandemic
Americans’ Trust in Government and Health Behaviors During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Communication for Coproduction
Trust in physicians and trust in government predict Covid‐19 vaccine uptake
Mistrust in public health institutions is a stronger predictor of vaccine hesitancy and uptake than Trust in Trump
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |