Using the Public Involvement Impact Assessment Framework to assess the impact of public involvement in a mental health research context
A reflective case study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19506715 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michelle Collins (0000-0001-5105-6408, Division of Health Research Lancaster University Lancaster UK, corresponding author), Rita Long (0000-0002-7129-1242, Spectrum Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UK), Anthony Page (0000-0003-4240-4292, Spectrum Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UK), Anthony S Page (Lancaster University), Jennie Popay (0000-0001-9234-908X, Division of Health Research Lancaster University Lancaster UK), Fiona Lobban (0000-0001-6594-4350, Spectrum Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UK) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 950-963 |
| Publication date | 2018-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/hex.12688 |
| PMID | 29696740 |
| OpenAlex | W2801326211 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 16 |
BACKGROUND: We assess the utility of the Public Involvement Impact Assessment Framework (PiiAF) as a resource to support research teams in assessing the impact of Public Involvement across diverse research and public involvement (PI) contexts. PiiAF was developed in response to a well-documented growth in Public Involvement in health research in the United Kingdom that demands a more sophisticated evidence base to demonstrate its impact. DESIGN: We used a reflective case study approach drawing on contemporaneous meeting notes, PiiAF website resources and retrospective reflections to describe how PiiAF helped us to develop an impact assessment plan of the PI in a university-based mental health research centre. DISCUSSION: We consider key aspects of our experiences of using PiiAF as a tool to help us design an impact assessment of PI, interpret these experiences with reference to relevant theory and research and share insights that may be useful to other teams considering using PiiAF. CONCLUSION: These insights include understanding the commitment of time and effort required to develop effective PI impact assessment plans; the flexibility of PiiAF and its ability to be used in a range of research and PI contexts; and the advantages of involving all stakeholders (including the public) in the development of an PI assessment plan
Impact assessment · Knowledge management · Management · Mental health · Political science · Psychiatry · Public health · Public involvement · Public relations · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Psychology · Public Administration
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research
Person-centred research practice
Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment
‘You've come to children that are in care and given us the opportunity to get our voices heard'
A framework for involving coproduction partners in research about young people with type 1 diabetes
Patient and Public Involvement of young people with a chronic condition in projects in health and social care
No Ethics Needed? Towards an Ethics of Care for Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement
Consortium‐Based Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement for Long Covid Research
Supporting the evaluation of public and patient engagement in health system organizations
Involvement of children and young people in the conduct of health research
Evaluating the “return on patient engagement initiatives” in medicines research and development
Consumer involvement in health research
Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research
‘The missing links’
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research
The impact of patient and public involvement in the work of the Dementias & Neurodegenerative Diseases Research Network (DeNDRoN)
What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study
Exciting but exhausting
‘But is it a question worth asking?’ A reflective case study describing how public involvement can lead to researchers’ ideas being abandoned
A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,22 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |