Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Understanding why patients with immune thrombocytopenia are deeply divided on splenectomy

Bibliographic Data

ID19506972
AuthorsKaren K W Wang (Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada), Cathy Charles (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada), Nancy M Heddle (0000-0002-9671-3501, Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada), Emmy Arnold (Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada), Laura Molnar (Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada), Donald M Arnold (0000-0003-0943-8853, Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume17
Issue6
Pages809-817
Publication date2014-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00806.x
PMID22882226
OpenAlexW2065808902
LanguageEN
References cited26

BACKGROUND: Splenectomy is an effective treatment for chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP); however, patients' willingness to accept splenectomy is variable. OBJECTIVE: To explore why some ITP patients accepted splenectomy when recommended by their physician while others refused. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study using one-to-one, in-depth patient interviews and a team-based approach to thematic analysis. RESULTS: Of 25 patients interviewed, 15 refused splenectomy and 10 accepted and were awaiting surgery. Themes about the influences on splenectomy decision making that emerged from patient interviews were (i) the perceived impact of ITP on quality of life, (ii) patients' view of splenectomy as a last resort treatment, (iii) patients' interpretations of the rates of treatment success and failure and (iv) a perceived lack of familiarity about ITP. Patients who accepted splenectomy perceived their disease as having a negative impact on their quality of life, whereas patients who refused felt their situation was not severe enough to warrant surgery. Patients developed their own experiential interpretations of the success rates of splenectomy quoted to them. A general lack of awareness of the clinical impact of ITP and its cause was identified by patients as barriers to choosing splenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' disease experience, perceptions of the lack of treatment alternatives, interpretations of treatment success and failure rates and a general lack of awareness about ITP influenced treatment choice. This study represents a first step towards contextualizing treatment decision making in ITP, focusing on patient preferences and values

Disease · General surgery · Immune thrombocytopenia · Qualitative research · Splenectomy · Thematic analysis · Blood groups and transfusion · Inflammatory Bowel Disease · Medicine · Nursing · Platelet Disorders and Treatments · Internal Medicine · Surgery

  • Whatever happened to qualitative description?

    Open Access•Margarete Sandelowski•Research in Nursing & Health•2000

  • Sample size in qualitative research

    Open Access•Margarete Sandelowski•Research in Nursing & Health•1995

  • Treatment decision aids

    Open Access•Cathy Charles, Amiram Gafni et al.•Health Expectations•2005

  • Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter

    Open Access•Cathy Charles, Amiram Gafni et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1999

  • Doing Nothing is No Choice

    Open Access•Cathy Charles, Tim Whelan et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•1998

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae