Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Co‐Designing an Easy‐Read Adult Social Care Outcomes Measure for Older People

Approach to and Reflections on Involving People Living With Dementia and Their Supporters

Bibliographic Data

ID19507009
AuthorsRasa Mikelyte (0000-0002-2772-8240, University of Kent, corresponding author), Keith Oliver (Media Working Group), Rosemary Oliver (Media Working Group), James Caiels (0000-0001-5299-4682, University of Kent), Stacey Rand (0000-0001-9071-2842, University of Kent), ELIZABETH FIELD (Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust), Lucy Webster (0000-0001-9152-4990, University of Kent), Ann‐marie Towers (0000-0003-3597-1061, King's College London)
Year2026
Volume29
Issue3
Pagese70712-e70712
Publication date2026-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.70712
PMID42266093
OpenAlexW7164175671
LanguageEN
References cited38

BACKGROUND: In the UK, over half a million older people rely on publicly funded social care services to support their daily living needs. It is crucial to measure the quality of these services to ensure they meet the needs of those they support. The Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) was developed to assess social care-related quality of life (SCRQoL; Netten et al., 2012). However, many older individuals, particularly those living with dementia, face difficulties completing standard questionnaires (Aznar et al., 2021). AIM: This project aimed to enhance the accessibility of the ASCOT toolkit for older people, enabling more people to self-report their experiences of social care. METHODS: We employed a co-design methodology, bringing together a working group of older adults, primarily those living with dementia, along with their carers/supporters, to adapt the ASCOT toolkit. The adaptation process involved six working group meetings. In between these meetings, three rounds of cognitive testing (Meadows, 2021) with 25 participants who had difficulties completing traditional questionnaires also took place, with findings brought back to the working group after each round, so they could further refine the toolkit in light of cognitive testing results. RESULTS: The final adapted version of the ASCOT toolkit differs significantly from the original. The cognitive testing results demonstrate a considerable reduction in challenges experienced by participants between testing rounds, indicating a more accessible and user-friendly tool. IMPLICATIONS: The findings from this project demonstrate that co-designing outcome measures with older people, particularly those living with dementia, is both feasible and impactful. This work offers a replicable model for creating inclusive, accessible tools that amplify the voices of service users. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: 8 older people, including those living with dementia, have co-designed the new version of the tool over 6 meetings. Further meetings took place to jointly design dissemination materials. Working group members have co-presented project findings at conferences and events, and two members have co-authored this article. PPI were involved from the funding acquisition stage of this project. Two PPI members who were not part of the working group were part of the project steering group

Activities of daily living · Adaptation (eye) · Assisted living · Cognition · Dementia · Independent living · Older people · Quality (philosophy) · Quality of life (healthcare) · Social Welfare · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Mental Health and Patient Involvement

  • Cognitive Interviewing

    Gordon Willis•Cognitive Interviewing•2005

  • Outcomes of social care for adults

    Open Access•Ann Netten, Pery Burge et al.•Health Technology Assessment•2012

  • Research co-design in health

    Open Access•Patrick Slattery, Alexander Saeri et al.•Health Research Policy and Systems•2020

  • The Prevalence of Dyslexia

    Open Access•Richard K Wagner, Fotena A Zirps et al.•Journal of Learning Disabilities•2020

  • Epistemic injustice and mental health research

    Open Access•Celestin Okoroji, Tanya Mackay et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2023

  • Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis to assess the structural validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit Proxy version (Ascot-Proxy) completed by care home staff

    Open Access•Stacey Rand, Ann‐marie Towers et al.•Quality of Life Research•2024

  • Enhancing quality of life measurement

    Open Access•James Caiels, Stacey Rand et al.•Quality of Life Research•2024

  • Factor structure and construct validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (Ascot-Carer)

    Open Access•Stacey Rand, Stacey E Rand et al.•Quality of Life Research•2015

  • Do we agree or disagree? A systematic review of the application of preference-based instruments in self and proxy reporting of quality of life in older people

    Open Access•Claire Hutchinson, Anthea Worley et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • Social citizenship when living with dementia

    Hanne Peoples, Jakob Varming et al.•Journal of Occupational Science•2022

  • Inclusive (social) citizenship and persons with dementia

    Open Access•Ruth Bartlett•Disability & Society•2021

  • Citizens defining citizenship

    Open Access•Gillian McIntyre, Noah Cogan et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2021

  • The challenge of inclusion for older people with impairments

    Open Access•Ellsworth Raymond•Journal of Aging Studies•2019

  • What do people value when they provide unpaid care for an older person? A meta-ethnography with interview follow-up

    Open Access•Hareth Al-Janabi, Joanna Coast et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2008

  • Exploring the Added Value of Inclusive Dementia Research Throughout (and Beyond) the Research Process

    Open Access•Joseph Webb, Jemima Dooley et al.•International Journal of…•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae