Co‐Designing an Easy‐Read Adult Social Care Outcomes Measure for Older People
Approach to and Reflections on Involving People Living With Dementia and Their Supporters
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19507009 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rasa Mikelyte (0000-0002-2772-8240, University of Kent, corresponding author), Keith Oliver (Media Working Group), Rosemary Oliver (Media Working Group), James Caiels (0000-0001-5299-4682, University of Kent), Stacey Rand (0000-0001-9071-2842, University of Kent), ELIZABETH FIELD (Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust), Lucy Webster (0000-0001-9152-4990, University of Kent), Ann‐marie Towers (0000-0003-3597-1061, King's College London) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | e70712-e70712 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/hex.70712 |
| PMID | 42266093 |
| OpenAlex | W7164175671 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 38 |
BACKGROUND: In the UK, over half a million older people rely on publicly funded social care services to support their daily living needs. It is crucial to measure the quality of these services to ensure they meet the needs of those they support. The Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) was developed to assess social care-related quality of life (SCRQoL; Netten et al., 2012). However, many older individuals, particularly those living with dementia, face difficulties completing standard questionnaires (Aznar et al., 2021). AIM: This project aimed to enhance the accessibility of the ASCOT toolkit for older people, enabling more people to self-report their experiences of social care. METHODS: We employed a co-design methodology, bringing together a working group of older adults, primarily those living with dementia, along with their carers/supporters, to adapt the ASCOT toolkit. The adaptation process involved six working group meetings. In between these meetings, three rounds of cognitive testing (Meadows, 2021) with 25 participants who had difficulties completing traditional questionnaires also took place, with findings brought back to the working group after each round, so they could further refine the toolkit in light of cognitive testing results. RESULTS: The final adapted version of the ASCOT toolkit differs significantly from the original. The cognitive testing results demonstrate a considerable reduction in challenges experienced by participants between testing rounds, indicating a more accessible and user-friendly tool. IMPLICATIONS: The findings from this project demonstrate that co-designing outcome measures with older people, particularly those living with dementia, is both feasible and impactful. This work offers a replicable model for creating inclusive, accessible tools that amplify the voices of service users. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: 8 older people, including those living with dementia, have co-designed the new version of the tool over 6 meetings. Further meetings took place to jointly design dissemination materials. Working group members have co-presented project findings at conferences and events, and two members have co-authored this article. PPI were involved from the funding acquisition stage of this project. Two PPI members who were not part of the working group were part of the project steering group
Activities of daily living · Adaptation (eye) · Assisted living · Cognition · Dementia · Independent living · Older people · Quality (philosophy) · Quality of life (healthcare) · Social Welfare · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Cognitive Interviewing
Outcomes of social care for adults
Research co-design in health
The Prevalence of Dyslexia
Epistemic injustice and mental health research
Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis to assess the structural validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit Proxy version (Ascot-Proxy) completed by care home staff
Enhancing quality of life measurement
Factor structure and construct validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (Ascot-Carer)
Do we agree or disagree? A systematic review of the application of preference-based instruments in self and proxy reporting of quality of life in older people
Social citizenship when living with dementia
Inclusive (social) citizenship and persons with dementia
Citizens defining citizenship
The challenge of inclusion for older people with impairments
What do people value when they provide unpaid care for an older person? A meta-ethnography with interview follow-up
Exploring the Added Value of Inclusive Dementia Research Throughout (and Beyond) the Research Process
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |