Public involvement in health and social sciences research
A concept analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19507026 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mel Hughes (0000-0003-4599-104X, Department of Social Work and Social Sciences Bournemouth University Bournemouth UK, corresponding author), Catherine Duffy (0009-0008-8177-4409, Department of Social Work and Social Sciences Bournemouth University Bournemouth UK) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1183-1190 |
| Publication date | 2018-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/hex.12825 |
| PMID | 30159960 |
| OpenAlex | W2889341940 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 24 |
| References cited | 29 |
BACKGROUND: Research funding bodies have significantly increased emphasis on the need for public involvement in research with the requirement to evidence effective methods and approaches to achieving this. Specific definitions and approaches within published research remain tokenistic and vague. OBJECTIVE: The concept analysis explores and clarifies the nature and meaning of public involvement in health and social sciences research and identifies operational definitions which can be used to guide, develop and evaluate public involvement in research activity. SEARCH STRATEGY: A literature search was conducted using online databases. Systematic literature reviews and broader studies on the impact of PPI were included as was grey literature such as guidance from INVOLVE and research funding bodies. Limits were set to papers published in the last 10 years and in the English language. A concept analysis framework adapted from Rodgers (Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques and Applications. London, UK: Saunders; 2000) and Walker and Avant (Strategies for Theory construction in Nursing. Boston, MA: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2005) was applied. MAIN RESULTS: Five operational definitions were developed from the concept analysis: undefined involvement; targeted consultation; embedded consultation; co-production; and user-led research. Typical examples of each approach were identified from the literature. Defining attributes included having clear and agreed meaning and purpose for any involvement; reciprocal relationships; and value and recognition of the expertise of all those involved. CONCLUSIONS: The authors argue the need for researchers to more explicitly incorporate and evaluate details of approaches used. Impact of public involvement on a research study should be identified when reporting on findings to prevent tokenistic practices where involvement is viewed as secondary to the core research process
Grey literature · Linguistics · Management science · MEDLINE · Political science · Public health · Reciprocal · Sociology · Systematic review · Computer Science · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Psychology
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Online Patient Forums in Genomic Data Governance
Legitimizing user knowledge in mental health services
Is the Invisibility of Dementia a Super-Power or a Curse? A Reflection on the SUNshiners’ Questionnaire into the Public Understanding of Dementia as an Invisible Disability
Universal health coverage evolution, ongoing trend, and future challenge
Lived experiences of disability among Swedish persons with multiple sclerosis
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research
Whose safeguarding is it anyway?” service user engagement in safeguarding processes
Designing a Flexible and Inclusive Approach for Public and Community Involvement in Research With People Who Are Homeless or Vulnerably Housed
How patient and community involvement in diabetes research influences health outcomes
Involving an individual with lived‐experience in a co‐analysis of qualitative data
The Value of Clinical Prediction Models in General Practice
Patient and public involvement in doctoral research
Addressing the Health Needs of Underserved Populations Through Public Contribution
Patient and public involvement in care home research
A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person‐centred randomized clinical trial
Embedding patient and public involvement
DryByChristmas
Transitional care for patients with acute stroke—A priority‐setting project
Public Involvement to Enhance Care Home Research; Collaboration on a Minimum Data Set for Care Homes
Embedding Public Involvement in a PhD Research Project With People Affected by Advanced Liver Disease
Participatory research with carers
Ethical Use of Simulative Technologies for Dementia Care in Long-Term Residential Facilities – A Qualitative Study Protocol
“An Active, Productive Life”
Becoming a 'Bricoleur' - Using a Holistic Bricolage Approach to Explore Breast Cancer Candidacy
The snakes and ladders of user involvement
Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research
‘But is it a question worth asking?’ A reflective case study describing how public involvement can lead to researchers’ ideas being abandoned
What is involvement in research and what does it achieve? Reflections on a pilot study of the personal costs of stroke
Patient and service user engagement in research
A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research
Models and Effectiveness of Service User and Carer Involvement in Social Work Education
Putting the parity into service‐user participation
Widening cross-disciplinary research for mental health’
Avoiding the involvement overdose
Keeping Service User Involvement in Research Honest
Employing Community Participative Research Methods to Advance Service User Collaboration in Social Work Research
Climbing the “Ladder of Participation”
| Citations per year | 3.43 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |