Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A qualitative study of rural women's views for the treatment of early breast cancer

Bibliographic Data

ID19507175
AuthorsEli Ristevski (0000-0001-6559-8398, Monash University School of Rural Health ‐ Monash University Department of Rural and Indigenous Health Moe Victoria Australia), Melanie Regan (Monash University School of Rural Health ‐ Monash University Department of Rural and Indigenous Health Moe Victoria Australia), David Birks (0000-0002-8416-1818, Monash University School of Rural Health ‐ Churchill Churchill Victoria Australia), Nicole Steers (Latrobe Community Health Service Morwell Victoria Australia), Anny Byrne (West Gippsland HealthCare Group Warragul Victoria Australia)
Year2015
Volume18
Issue6
Pages2928-2940
Publication date2015-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.12277
PMID25267503
OpenAlexW1984914532
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited40

AIM: Identify what factors rural women perceived to influence their surgical choice for EBC. BACKGROUND: Higher rates of mastectomy still remain for women with early breast cancer (EBC) in rural areas. While access to radiotherapy is a commonly identified barrier, there is growing debate around other factors which are also important influences on surgical choice. METHODS: Qualitative study with 70 interviews with women diagnosed with EBC in rural Gippsland, Australia. Twenty-nine women had a mastectomy and 41 had breast conserving surgery (BCS). RESULTS: Patient led psychosocial and surgeon led factors influenced surgical choice. Psychosocial factors were a greater influence for the mastectomy group. These included a high fear of cancer recurrence and radiotherapy, negative views of the body and breast, a family history of cancer, wanting to avoid the negative treatment experiences they had seen significant others go through, and not wanting to travel for treatment. Surgeon led factors were a greater influence for the BCS group, in particular, the direct recommendation made by the surgeon for BCS. For both groups, urgency to act was a shared psychosocial factor. Trust and confidence in the expertise and reputation of the surgeon and their consultation style were surgeon led factors shared by the groups. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure women achieve the best treatment outcome, patients and clinicians need to work together to identify how important and influential the various factors are for the women and, if necessary, to seek support to ensure informed decisions are made

Breast cancer · Breast-conserving surgery · Cancer · Family medicine · Mastectomy · Psychiatry · Psychosocial · Qualitative research · Breast Cancer Treatment Studies · Cancer survivorship and care · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Medicine · Internal Medicine

  • Behaviour, barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in breast cancer surgical treatment

    Open Access•Hongying Zheng, Linning Yang et al.•Health Expectations•2024

  • Physician‐related facilitators and barriers to patient involvement in treatment decision making in early stage breast cancer

    Open Access•Mary Ann O’Brien, Peter M Ellis et al.•Health Expectations•2013

  • Is Distance to Provider a Barrier to Care for Medicaid Patients With Breast, Colorectal, or Lung Cancer

    Open Access•John F Scoggins, Catherine R Fedorenko et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2012

  • Travel time to radiotherapy and uptake of breast-conserving surgery for early stage cancer in Northern England

    Open Access•V Sauerzapf, V A Sauerzapf et al.•Health & Place•2007

  • The ethics of responsibility and ownership in decision-making about treatment for breast cancer

    Open Access•Nicola Mendick, Bridget Young et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2010

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae